Woodmont Health Campus
1325 Rockport Rd, Boonville, IN 47601 · Warrick County · 60 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Nov 8, 2000
Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (29)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint |
| Mar 13, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint |
| Sep 2, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Oct 29, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint |
| Jul 26, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jul 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jul 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. |
| Jul 26, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 26, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
| Mar 20, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jan 26, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint |
| Aug 16, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.66 | 3.42 | 3.95 | bottom 9% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.62 | 0.69 | bottom 38% in Indiana; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.35 | 3.01 | 3.50 | bottom 9% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.48 | bottom 48% in Indiana; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.0 | 45.9 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Indiana; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 28.6 | 40.4 | 42.9 | top 28% in Indiana; top 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.11, RN 0.59, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Who owns this facility
Government - County
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Good Samaritan Hospital | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/01/2015 |
| American Healthcare Reit Holdings LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| American Healthcare Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Barney, Leigh | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/03/2025 |
| Continental Merger Sub LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2021 |
| Corbin, Kathy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Davis, David | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2019 |
| Deyne, Jennie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Deyne, Jennie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/2025 |
| Gahc3 Trilogy JV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Gahc4 Trilogy JV LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2018 |
| Good Samaritan Hospital | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Keybank National Association | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/11/2018 |
| Keybank National Association | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/20/2025 |
| McLin, Robert | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/1992 |
| McLin, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/1992 |
| McLin, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/1992 |
| Paragon Outpatient Rehabilitation Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2015 |
| Sash, Karl | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2014 |
| Sash, Karl | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcendent Healthcare of Boonville | 3.1 mi | Boonville, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Transcendent Healthcare of Boonville - North | 3.6 mi | Boonville, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Cypress Grove Rehabilitation Center | 9.2 mi | Newburgh, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care Center | 10.1 mi | Newburgh, IN | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hamilton Pointe Health and Rehab | 11.8 mi | Newburgh, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Newburgh Health and Rehab | 12.1 mi | Newburgh, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Majestic Care of Newburgh | 12.2 mi | Newburgh, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Waters of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, the | 13.1 mi | Rockport, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| River Pointe Health Campus | 14.0 mi | Evansville, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Evansville Protestant Home | 15.2 mi | Evansville, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Envive of Evansville | 15.7 mi | Evansville, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Core of Dale | 16.8 mi | Dale, IN | —/5 | SFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155682.