IndianaBoonville

Woodmont Health Campus

1325 Rockport Rd, Boonville, IN 47601 · Warrick County · 60 certified beds · avg 52 residents/day · certified since Nov 8, 2000

Part of chain: TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES (123 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Sep 2, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Sep 2, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jul 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 26, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Mar 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Aug 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jun 9, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 9, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390D
202480F
202590E
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.663.423.95bottom 9% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.500.620.69bottom 38% in Indiana; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.353.013.50bottom 9% in Indiana; bottom 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.470.48bottom 48% in Indiana; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.045.945.8bottom 40% in Indiana; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)28.640.442.9top 28% in Indiana; top 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.11, RN 0.59, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Good Samaritan HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/01/2015
American Healthcare Reit Holdings LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
American Healthcare Reit INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Barney, LeighIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/03/2025
Continental Merger Sub LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2021
Corbin, KathyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2015
Davis, DavidIndividualLimited Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2019
Deyne, JennieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Deyne, JennieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2025
Gahc3 Trilogy JV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Gahc4 Trilogy JV LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2018
Good Samaritan HospitalOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2015
Keybank National AssociationOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2018
Keybank National AssociationOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/20/2025
McLin, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/06/1992
McLin, RobertIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/1992
McLin, RobertIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/1992
Paragon Outpatient Rehabilitation Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Sash, KarlIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Sash, KarlIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Transcendent Healthcare of Boonville3.1 miBoonville, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Transcendent Healthcare of Boonville - North3.6 miBoonville, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Cypress Grove Rehabilitation Center9.2 miNewburgh, IN★★★★★4/5
Brickyard Healthcare - Woodlands Care Center10.1 miNewburgh, IN★★★★☆3/5
Hamilton Pointe Health and Rehab11.8 miNewburgh, IN★★☆☆☆1/5
Newburgh Health and Rehab12.1 miNewburgh, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Majestic Care of Newburgh12.2 miNewburgh, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Waters of Rockport Skilled Nursing Facility, the13.1 miRockport, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
River Pointe Health Campus14.0 miEvansville, IN★★★★★4/5
Evansville Protestant Home15.2 miEvansville, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Envive of Evansville15.7 miEvansville, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Core of Dale16.8 miDale, IN—/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Boonville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155682.