How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2530 North Elm Street, Miami, OK 74354 (opens Google Maps) · Ottawa County · (918) 540-2300· 100 certified beds · avg 41 residents/day · certified since Mar 6, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: OKLAHOMA NURSING HOMES, LTD. (7 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. F-0727
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Aug 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 22, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 12 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oklahoma avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.35 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 39% in Oklahoma; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.65 | 0.41 | 0.69 | top 10% in Oklahoma; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.97 | 4.16 | 3.50 | bottom 40% in Oklahoma; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.50 | 0.28 | 0.48 | top 7% in Oklahoma; top 33% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 55.5 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 53.6 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.52, weekend 3.17.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.47 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Windridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheek, Barnie | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 03/01/2019 |
| Estep, Patsy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 03/01/2019 |
| Haskins, Lloyd | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 03/01/2019 |
| McGrew, Justin | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 6% | 03/01/2019 |
| Sandra Cheek Farmer Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/01/2025 |
| Steven R. Tubbs Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 01/01/2023 |
| Carolyn D Leaverton Revocable Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| McGrew, Justin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Sandra Cheek Farmer Trust | Organization | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Vandelinder, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Oklahoma Nursing Homes, LTD. — 7 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastwood Manor | 1.8 mi | Commerce, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Miami Nursing Center, LLC | 2.9 mi | Miami, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Higher Call Nursing Center | 5.3 mi | Quapaw, OK | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maple Healthcare and Rehab | 10.8 mi | Fairland, OK | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Quaker Hill Manor | 13.3 mi | Baxter Springs, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Seneca Nursing | 14.2 mi | Seneca, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Galena Nursing & Rehab Center | 17.3 mi | Galena, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Medicalodges Columbus | 18.3 mi | Columbus, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Communities of Wildwood Ranch | 18.4 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Westgate | 18.4 mi | Joplin, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375335.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details