How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Wichita Presbyterian Manor
4700 W 13th Street North, Wichita, KS 67212 (opens Google Maps) · Sedgwick County · (316) 942-7456· 50 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: PRESBYTERIAN MANORS OF MID-AMERICA (13 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 28, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Dec 6, 2021
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.16
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 6, 2021 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 6, 2021 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Nov 24, 2021 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint F-0947
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| May 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| May 28, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention. · from a complaint · F-0947 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · from a complaint · F-0554 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint · F-0605 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint · F-0756 |
| May 28, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint · F-0757 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 6, 2021 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 6, 2021 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 6, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Dec 6, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 10).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2023
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 10 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityKansas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.16
Kansas average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.07
Kansas average: 0.81
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.44
Kansas average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.16 | 4.58 | 3.95 | top 26% in Kansas; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.07 | 0.81 | 0.69 | top 20% in Kansas; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.44 | 4.05 | 3.50 | top 31% in Kansas; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 28% in Kansas; top 24% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 59.6 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in Kansas; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 42.0 | 42.9 | bottom 17% in Kansas; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.69, RN 0.97, weekend 4.03.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Wichita Presbyterian Manor. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presbyterian Manors INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/30/1989 |
| Brennecke, Gary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Cook, James | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Cumberland, Richard | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2017 |
| Harris, Daniel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2006 |
| Hind, Sherry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/1989 |
| McKell, Elizabeth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Miller, Joan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/1997 |
| Morrison, Aaron | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Nelson, Eleanor | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2010 |
| Ott, Ray | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2010 |
| Owens, Melanie | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/10/2017 |
| Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/30/1989 |
| Radatz, Bradley | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2017 |
| Shogren, Bruce | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/05/1996 |
| Taylor, William | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2015 |
| Wedel, Randy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2010 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Presbyterian Manors of Mid-America — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Farmington Presbyterian Manor — Farmington, MO · overall 5/5
- Rolla Presbyterian Manor — Rolla, MO · overall 5/5
- Aberdeen Village — Olathe, KS · overall 5/5
- Arkansas City Presbyterian Manor — Arkansas City, KS · overall 5/5
- Clay Center Presbyterian Manor — Clay Center, KS · overall 5/5
- Emporia Presbyterian Manor — Emporia, KS · overall 3/5
- Lawrence Presbyterian Manor — Lawrence, KS · overall 3/5
- Manor of the Plains — Dodge City, KS · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What specific training do your nurse aides complete in dementia care and abuse prevention, and how often is it refreshed?"
- "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 60% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 31 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lakepoint Wichita, LLC | 0.4 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Sandpiper Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meridian Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 1.4 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ascension Living via Christi Village McLean | 1.6 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Via Christi Village Ridge | 3.2 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Azria Health Wichita | 3.7 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rolling Hills Health and Rehab | 4.1 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Homestead Health Center | 4.3 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Family Health & Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Medicalodges Wichita | 5.9 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Mount St Mary | 6.2 mi | Wichita, KS | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Lincoln Care and Rehab | 6.5 mi | Wichita, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Sedgwick, KS — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Avita Health and Rehab at Reeds Cove — Wichita, KS · overall 3/5
- Caritas Center, INC — Wichita, KS · overall 5/5
- Catholic Care Center, INC — Bel Aire, KS · overall 2/5
- Center at Waterfront LLC — Wichita, KS · overall 3/5
- Cheney Golden Age Home — Cheney, KS · overall 3/5
- Clearwater Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Clearwater, KS · overall 1/5abuseSFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175301.