How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3419 Highway 9, Freehold, NJ 07728 (opens Google Maps) · Monmouth County · (732) 677-1200· 151 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Dec 17, 2008 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Mar 3, 2023 · F-0760
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Apr 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 19, 2025 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint · F-0577 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 3, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Jan 20, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 4).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 6 | 1 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 4 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.10 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 9% in New Jersey; bottom 17% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.66 | 0.67 | 0.69 | top 36% in New Jersey; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.55 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 2% in New Jersey; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.52 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 32% in New Jersey; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.8 | 39.7 | 45.8 | top 40% in New Jersey; top 26% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.8 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 41% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.99, RN 0.64, weekend 2.46.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.99 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Wedgwood Gardens Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Partnership
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Karat LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Esther Friedman Revocable Trust for Heshy Sobel | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Kaszirer Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Henry | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 05/16/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Miriam | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Sarah | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Route 9 North LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Wedgwood Gardens Care Center | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/16/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Henry | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Robert | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2008 |
| Kaszirer, Sarah | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2008 |
| Sobel, Heshy | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/15/2008 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manor, the | 2.0 mi | Freehold, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Jewish Home for Rehabilitation and Nursing, the | 2.1 mi | Freehold, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Applewood Village, INC | 2.7 mi | Freehold, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Allaire Rehab & Nursing | 2.9 mi | Freehold, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Bartley Nursing & Rehab | 6.4 mi | Jackson, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Excel Care at Manalapan | 7.3 mi | Manalapan, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aster Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 9.1 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge | 9.7 mi | Old Bridge, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Continuing Care at Seabrook | 9.8 mi | Tinton Falls, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Wall | 9.8 mi | Allenwood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| De la Salle Hall | 10.1 mi | Lincroft, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Careone at Holmdel | 10.4 mi | Holmdel, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Monmouth, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315504.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details