2059 Torredge Road, Durham, NC 27712 (opens Google Maps) · Durham County · (919) 477-4474· 132 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since May 16, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS (43 facilities, chain avg rating 3.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 19, 2024 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 19, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jun 19, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 8, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. F-0561
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. F-0756
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jun 19, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jun 19, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 19, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jun 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint · F-0867 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Feb 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Aug 11, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · from a complaint · F-0740 |
| Aug 11, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 3 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $124,534.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 2024 | Fine | $124,534 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | North Carolina avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.99 | 4.01 | 3.95 | top 32% in North Carolina; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in North Carolina; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.73 | 3.56 | 3.50 | top 26% in North Carolina; top 32% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.48 | top 49% in North Carolina; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 69.2 | 49.0 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in North Carolina; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 83.3 | 45.7 | 42.9 | bottom 4% in North Carolina; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.66, RN 0.46, weekend 3.43.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.66 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Treyburn Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cronquist 2015 Family Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/31/2015 |
| Mangine, John | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| 2059, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| 2059, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Chery, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/08/2017 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Cronquist, Royce | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2018 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Forvis Mazars LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2025 |
| Health Services Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Health Services Properties LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/23/2025 |
| Kaar, Susan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Kaar, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Kelly, Michelle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2018 |
| Kerley, Steven | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Kerley, Steven | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Mangine, John | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2014 |
| Melton, Donald | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/31/2016 |
Showing 20 of 31 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 11 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Sovereign Healthcare Holdings — 43 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 42 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accordius Health at Rose Manor LLC | 4.0 mi | Durham, NC | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Carver Living Center | 4.2 mi | Durham, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Croasdaile Village | 5.8 mi | Durham, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hillcrest Convalescent Center | 7.0 mi | Durham, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Pettigrew Rehabilitation Center | 7.0 mi | Durham, NC | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| University Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.4 mi | Durham, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Pruitthealth-Durham | 8.0 mi | Durham, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Forest at Duke INC | 9.7 mi | Durham, NC | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| Pruitthealth-Carolina Point | 10.3 mi | Durham, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Peak Resources - Brookshire, INC | 11.8 mi | Hillsborough, NC | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Southpoint Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 13.0 mi | Durham, NC | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Parkview Health and Rehabilitation Center | 13.3 mi | Chapel Hill, NC | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345458.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details