MississippiIuka

Tishomingo Manor

230 Khaki Street, Iuka, MS 38852 · Tishomingo County · 105 certified beds · avg 100 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1996

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$29,145
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 30, 2025 · F-0550 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Why it matters: Being treated without dignity harms a resident's self-worth, mental health, and overall quality of life.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 20, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 2, 2025 · F-0603

The facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.

Why it matters: Forced isolation is emotionally harmful and can hide neglect or abuse from view.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Apr 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 24, 2023 · F-0656

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 24, 2023 · F-0677

The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.

Why it matters: Residents who don't get this help can suffer poor hygiene, skin breakdown, weight loss, and a loss of dignity.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 24, 2023 · F-0725

The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.

Why it matters: Understaffing means longer waits for help, missed care, and higher risk of falls and other harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 12, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 30, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment.
Apr 2, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Apr 2, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 22, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
May 22, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 24, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 24, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 24, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
May 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
May 24, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202363G ▲
202420F
202572G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $29,145.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 30, 2025Fine$16,720
Apr 2, 2025Fine$12,425

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMississippi avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.954.883.95bottom 12% in Mississippi; top 41% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.740.69bottom 32% in Mississippi; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.534.093.50bottom 21% in Mississippi; top 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.380.48top 20% in Mississippi; top 40% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.145.745.8bottom 46% in Mississippi; bottom 50% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.038.442.9top 28% in Mississippi; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.53, weekend 3.47. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Elton G Beebe Sr Irrv Grndchildrens TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%01/01/2010
Elton G. Beebe Sr Irrv Childrens TrOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest85%01/01/2010
Account Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Account Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Beebe, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Beebe, BobbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Cain, JenniferIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/23/2011
Elton G Beebe Family Mortage TrustOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Elton G. Beebe Sr Irrv Childrens TrOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Four Generations Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Glynn, MargaretIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2013
Glynn, MargaretIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/24/2013
Linda MaynorOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2011
Nutrition Systems Consulting INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2008
Parkinson, ToniIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/15/2015
Parkinson, ToniIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Parkinson, ToniIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Pharmaceutical Consulting Services of America LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Tishomingo Comm Living Center1.4 miIuka, MS★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 1 closest →

All facilities in Iuka →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255218.