7380 Ulmerton Rd, Largo, FL 33771 (opens Google Maps) · Pinellas County · (727) 535-9833· 120 certified beds · avg 114 residents/day · certified since Nov 2, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. F-0645
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 30, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Apr 15, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · from a complaint · F-0908 |
| Oct 31, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough staff with the right skills to meet the mental and behavioral health needs of its residents, such as those living with dementia or depression. · F-0741 |
| Dec 8, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Apr 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Apr 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 9, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $4,147.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2025 | Fine | $4,147 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.64 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 27% in Florida; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.40 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 8% in Florida; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 34% in Florida; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 3% in Florida; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 58.3 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 11% in Florida; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 78.9 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 5% in Florida; bottom 6% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.31, RN 0.36, weekend 3.09.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.31 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Tierra Pines Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Friedman, Leopold | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2023 |
| Gabriel Living Center, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2023 |
| Gutman, Samuel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Lce Partners LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Tierra Pines Holdco LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/15/2023 |
| Aston Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Hicks, Marquita | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2025 |
| Shah, Nilamben | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2025 |
| Shah, Nilamben | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/03/2025 |
| Stanley, Agnes | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/25/2021 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Wooten, Constance | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2025 |
| Wooten, Constance | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/29/2025 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Aston Health — 38 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 37 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabal Palms Health & Rehabilitation | 1.1 mi | Largo, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| East Bay Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Bryan Dairy | 2.1 mi | Largo, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Palm Garden of Largo | 2.3 mi | Largo, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Palm Garden of Pinellas | 2.9 mi | Largo, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Gulf Shore Care Center | 3.1 mi | Pinellas Park, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Wrights Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 3.7 mi | Seminole, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pinellas Park FL Opco, LLC | 3.9 mi | Pinellas Park, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Aviata at Seminole | 4.2 mi | Seminole, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Vivo Healthcare Gateway | 4.2 mi | Pinellas Park, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Belleair Health Care Center | 4.5 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Harbourwood Post-Acute and Rehabilitation Center | 4.6 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Pinellas, FL — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105398.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details