VermontBrattleboro

Thompson House Nursing Home

80 Maple Street, Brattleboro, VT 05301 · Windham County · 43 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1995

SFF Candidate

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$112,499
Fines, last 3 years
4.58
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Dec 9, 2025 · F-0919 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.

Why it matters: A resident who falls or needs help in a bathroom without a working call button may be stranded and unable to summon aid.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Jan 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 9, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 9, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (7)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 9, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Dec 9, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 9, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 20, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330F
202543K ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $112,499.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 9, 2025Fine$112,499

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityVermont avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.584.343.95top 45% in Vermont; top 21% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.900.820.69top 36% in Vermont; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.913.763.50top 42% in Vermont; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.520.520.48top 48% in Vermont; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)56.155.445.8top 39% in Vermont; bottom 23% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.039.942.9top 45% in Vermont; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.95, RN 0.98, weekend 4.22. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Abell, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2019
Dickey, KariIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Dickey, KariIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2026
Huestis, StephanieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2019
Mabie, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2018
Morton, JudithIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/12/2022
Pratt, TaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2024
Pratt, TaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2026
Taylor Olson, CarolynIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Veenema, RonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pine Heights at Brattleboro Center for Nursing & R0.2 miBrattleboro, VT★★★★★4/5
Vernon Green Nursing Home6.4 miVernon, VT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Cheshire County Home10.2 miWestmoreland, NH★★★★☆3/5
Applewood Center10.8 miWinchester, NH★★★★★5/5
Covenant Living of Keene14.5 miKeene, NH★★★★☆3/5
Langdon Place of Keene15.6 miKeene, NH★★★★★5/5
Keene Center, Genesis Healthcare15.6 miKeene, NH★★★☆☆3/5
Alpine Healthcare Center15.7 miKeene, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Poet's Seat Healthcare Center16.7 miGreenfield, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Charlene Manor Extended Care Facility17.6 miGreenfield, MA★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brattleboro →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 475050.