Oklahoma ›Durant

The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1223 West Baltimore, Durant, OK 74701 (opens Google Maps) · Bryan County · (580) 924-0496· 65 certified beds · avg 33 residents/day · certified since Jul 6, 2001 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 19, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 6, 2024
$15,249
Fines, last 3 years
5.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 6, 2024 · F-0689

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Feb 29, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · from a complaint F-0883

  3. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689

View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
Jun 19, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · from a complaint · F-0883
Feb 6, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Feb 6, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607
Feb 6, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · F-0835
Feb 6, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · F-0839
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Jan 5, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jan 5, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Jan 5, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 13
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330E
2024131J ▲
202520D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $15,249.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 6, 2024Fine$15,249

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityOklahoma averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.62
Oklahoma average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.69
Oklahoma average: 0.41
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.80
Oklahoma average: 4.16
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityOklahoma avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.624.583.95top 9% in Oklahoma; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.410.69top 8% in Oklahoma; top 38% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.804.163.50top 20% in Oklahoma; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.490.280.48top 7% in Oklahoma; top 35% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.655.545.8top 4% in Oklahoma; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.053.642.9top 28% in Oklahoma; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.48, RN 0.55, weekend 3.82.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.48 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The King's Daughters & Sons Nursing Home. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Arcp Health, LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—11/01/2020
Carrus Healthcare, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/01/2020
Nachimuthu, AnbarasuIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—11/01/2020
Rains, JonIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest—11/01/2020
Bagdure, SatishIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Bagdure, SatishIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2024
Bartley, ChristieIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Bartley, ChristieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2019
Bartley, ChristieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2024
Carrus Healthcare, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Carrus Healthcare, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/26/2024
Nachimuthu, AnbarasuIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Nachimuthu, AnbarasuIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Nachimuthu, AnbarasuIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Nachimuthu, AnbarasuIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Rains, JonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Rains, JonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Rains, JonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020
Rains, JonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2020

All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
  • "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
  • "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
  • "What were the findings behind this administration citation, and what has leadership changed since?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Four Seasons Rehabilitation & Care2.4 miDurant, OK★☆☆☆☆3/5
Oakridge Nursing Center2.6 miDurant, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Calera Manor9.3 miCalera, OK★★☆☆☆3/5
Southern Pointe Living Center11.7 miColbert, OK★☆☆☆☆2/5
Family Care Center of Kingston17.2 miKingston, OK★★★☆☆4/5
The Homestead of Denison17.9 miDenison, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Avir at Memorial18.2 miDenison, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Woodlands Place Rehabilitation Suites19.5 miDenison, TX★★★☆☆2/5
Denison Nursing and Rehab19.7 miDenison, TX★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Durant →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 375397.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details