OhioAshland

The Good Shepherd Health and Rehabilitation Center

622 Center St, Ashland, OH 44805 · Ashland County · 125 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 27, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Nov 24, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jul 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Jul 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 27, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 3, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Mar 3, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 3, 2022C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Mar 3, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 5, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 5, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offWhen a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Apr 5, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2019130E
202260F
202311G ▲
202470E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOhio avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.913.453.95top 18% in Ohio; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.810.600.69top 14% in Ohio; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.133.073.50top 35% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.420.48top 16% in Ohio; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.148.745.8top 10% in Ohio; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.643.942.9top 27% in Ohio; top 29% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.73, RN 0.98, weekend 3.79. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Lutheran Social Services of Central Ohio, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%11/29/1999
Abraham, JosephIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2006
Abraham, JosephIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2006
Applegate, AliciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2020
Applegate, AliciaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2020
Bogner, KristyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2020
Bogner, KristyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2020
Dubbe, HeatherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2007
Dubbe, HeatherIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2007
Dunn, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Enhance Therapies Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Fratianne, JuliaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2025
Fratianne, JuliaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2025
Fratianne, JuliaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/07/2025
HuntingtonOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Kendall, EarlIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2019
Kerr, RonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Kerr, SarahIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2001
Kerr, SarahIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2001
Lustig, RachelIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/15/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Crystal Care Center of Ashland1.1 miAshland, OH★☆☆☆☆2/5
Brethren Care Village Health Care Center1.2 miAshland, OH★★★★★4/5
Kingston of Ashland1.9 miAshland, OH★★★☆☆2/5
Arbors at Mifflin9.1 miMansfield, OH★★★☆☆3/5
Oak Grove Manor9.1 miMansfield, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Country Pointe11.3 miWooster, OH★★★★★5/5
Jag Healthcare Mansfield13.3 miMansfield, OH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Winchester Terrace13.6 miMansfield, OH★★☆☆☆2/5
Crystal Care Center of Mansfie14.0 miMansfield, OH★★★☆☆4/5
Liberty Nursing Center of Mansfield14.1 miMansfield, OH★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Ashland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365093.