How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
2840 Knapp Street, Brooklyn, NY 11235 (opens Google Maps) · Kings County · (718) 646-5700· 200 certified beds · avg 195 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1985 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint F-0609
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. F-0575
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · F-0575 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 24, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Apr 11, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Apr 11, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Oct 10, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.12 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 33% in New York; bottom 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 42% in New York; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.77 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 36% in New York; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 34% in New York; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 25.1 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 14% in New York; top 7% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 39.2 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 47% in New York; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.73, weekend 3.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.69 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Sheepshead Nursing & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estate of Adolf Weider | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 25% | 09/25/2006 |
| Kahan, Pearl | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 14% | 09/25/2006 |
| Lipschitz, Chaim | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 05/23/2011 |
| Lipschitz, Elliot | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 05/23/2011 |
| Lipschitz, Samuel | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 12% | 05/23/2011 |
| Paneth, Morton | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 09/25/2006 |
| Kahan, Jerome | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2006 |
| Lipschitz, Olga | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2011 |
| Lipschitz, Olga | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2011 |
| Tsantker, Mina | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/25/2006 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menorah Home & Hospital for Aged & Infirm | 0.7 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Chateau at Brooklyn Rehabilitation and Nursing | 1.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shore View Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 1.9 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Sea Crest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 3.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Saints Joachim & Anne Nursing and Rehabilitation C | 3.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Seagate Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 3.5 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Haym Solomon Home for the Aged | 3.5 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| King David Center for Nursing and Rehabilitation | 3.5 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ditmas Park Care Center | 4.0 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bensonhurst Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare | 4.1 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Four Seasons Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.3 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Heritage Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 4.4 mi | Brooklyn, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Kings, NY — 40 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335677.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details