How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1795 South Chelemes Way, Clearfield, UT 84015 (opens Google Maps) · Davis County · (801) 614-5700· 30 certified beds · avg 28 residents/day · certified since Apr 16, 2009 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. F-0804
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jul 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · F-0867 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or obtain x-rays and other imaging tests when ordered, or did not promptly tell the ordering doctor the results. · F-0777 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not perform required COVID-19 testing on residents and staff. · F-0886 |
| Jun 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 13 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Utah avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.82 | 3.87 | 3.95 | top 8% in Utah; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 2.11 | 1.17 | 0.69 | top 7% in Utah; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.65 | 3.39 | 3.50 | top 11% in Utah; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 1.49 | 0.88 | 0.48 | top 9% in Utah; top 2% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 30.6 | 50.7 | 45.8 | top 6% in Utah; top 15% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 8.3 | 40.6 | 42.9 | top 2% in Utah; top 3% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.78, RN 2.09, weekend 4.62.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compas, David | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Pulham, Randy | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 04/01/2025 |
| Stucki, Clay | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2025 |
| Stucki, Ron | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 32% | 07/20/2022 |
| Wilcox, John | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 07/20/2022 |
| Anderson, Aaron | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2022 |
| Archuleta, Brooke | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/09/2025 |
| Compas, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/20/2022 |
| Compas, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2025 |
| Pulham, Randy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/20/2022 |
| Stucki, Clay | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/03/2025 |
| Stucki, Ron | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/20/2022 |
| Wilcox, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/20/2022 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rocky Mountain Care- Clearfield | 1.3 mi | Clearfield, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Fairfield Village Rehabilitation | 3.7 mi | Layton, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Heritage Park Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 5.7 mi | Roy, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Pine View Transitional Rehab | 6.3 mi | South Ogden, UT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Terrace Transitional | 6.4 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mt Ogden Health and Rehabilitation Center | 6.4 mi | Washington Terrace, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Mountain View Health Services | 6.6 mi | Ogden, UT | —/5 | SFF | |
| South Ogden Post-Acute (cascades at South Ogden) | 6.6 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Stonehenge of Ogden | 7.3 mi | Washington Terrace, UT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Crestwood Rehabilitation and Nursing | 8.7 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Harrison Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 8.9 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lomond Peak Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC | 13.3 mi | Ogden, UT | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Davis, UT — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 465169.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details