Swan Health at Overland Park
6505 W 103rd Street, Overland Park, KS 66212 · Johnson County · 44 certified beds · avg 35 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 1993
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 3, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.
Corrected: Mar 28, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 9, 2026 · F-0690 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Why it matters: Poor continence and catheter care leads to infections, skin breakdown, and loss of dignity.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jun 14, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 18, 2025 · F-0692 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Sep 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (31)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint |
| Sep 18, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| May 6, 2025 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint |
| Mar 3, 2025 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint |
| Mar 3, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint |
| Mar 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint |
| Mar 3, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint |
| Sep 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Sep 27, 2023 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 11).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 16 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
3 fines totaling $79,050, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025 | Fine | $6,578 |
| Mar 3, 2025 | Fine | $55,003 |
| Nov 8, 2023 | Fine | $17,469 |
| Nov 8, 2023 | Payment Denial | 7 days from Nov 28, 2023 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Kansas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.09 | 4.58 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in Kansas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.81 | 0.69 | bottom 14% in Kansas; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 1.90 | 4.05 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in Kansas; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.88 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 7% in Kansas; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 66.7 | 48.1 | 45.8 | bottom 10% in Kansas; bottom 8% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 81.3 | 42.0 | 42.9 | bottom 8% in Kansas; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.42, RN 0.99, weekend 4.01. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HHN Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 08/25/2024 |
| Myerowitz, Netanel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2024 |
| Geha, Christopher | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Geha, Christopher | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Geha, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Geha, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2024 |
| Myerowitz, Netanel | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2024 |
| Myerowitz, Netanel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/08/2025 |
| Myerowitz, Netanel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/10/2025 |
| Wors, Patricia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2024 |
| Wors, Patricia | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/25/2024 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "How many hours a day is a registered nurse physically in the building, including weekends?"
- "How do you decide you have enough staff and resources for your resident population, including nights and weekends?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overland Park Post Acute | 0.8 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Advanced Health Care of Overland Park | 1.1 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★★ | 3/5 | |
| Brookdale Overland Park | 2.1 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Village Shalom INC | 2.5 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★★☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Carondelet LLC | 3.2 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Claridge Court | 3.2 mi | Prairie Village, KS | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Kingswood Senior Living | 3.5 mi | Kansas City, MO | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aspen Health and Wellness | 3.5 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens of Overland Park | 3.6 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Shawnee Post Acute Rehabilitation Center | 3.6 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort Overland Park LLC | 3.7 mi | Overland Park, KS | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Delmar Gardens of Lenexa | 3.7 mi | Lenexa, KS | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Overland Park →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175240.