Nebraska ›Lincoln

St. Jane de Chantal

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

2200 South 52nd Street, Lincoln, NE 68506 (opens Google Maps) · Lancaster County · (402) 413-3607· 103 certified beds · avg 79 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jan 8, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.19
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. F-0604

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. F-0644

View all 11 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 8, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · F-0604
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740
Jan 8, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 8).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202430D
202680E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNebraska averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.19
Nebraska average: 4.33
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.29
Nebraska average: 0.72
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.76
Nebraska average: 3.79
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.194.333.95top 14% in Nebraska; top 11% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.290.720.69top 6% in Nebraska; top 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.763.793.50top 11% in Nebraska; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.610.470.48top 1% in Nebraska; top 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)32.348.745.8top 16% in Nebraska; top 18% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.944.142.9top 25% in Nebraska; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 7.36, RN 1.83, weekend 6.75.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (7.36 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for St. Jane de Chantal. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cassels, ScottIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2022
Coffey, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2023
Doane, HeidiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2023
Dongilli, PaulIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2006
Dongilli, PaulIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2016
Dongilli, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/16/2016
Dongilli, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2006
Douglas, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/12/2018
Douglas, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/17/2020
Essay, PhillipIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2023
Gannon, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2017
Gannon, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2019
Hayes, AdamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2024
Hedderman, MichaelIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2019
Hedderman, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2019
Lempka, KatherineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2017
Lighthall, MariaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/30/2022
McKiernan, AlexanderIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/29/2023
Nietfeldt, BradleyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/21/2016
Perkins, GaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/27/2017

Showing 20 of 30 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 10 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "What is your policy on physical restraints, and what alternatives do you try first?"
  • "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
  • "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
  • "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 32% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 30 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 15 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Ambassador Health of Lincoln0.5 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Holmes Lake Rehabilitation & Care Center0.7 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Eventide Lincoln Care Center1.1 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Gateway Vista1.7 miLincoln, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Brookside LLC1.7 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Eastmont1.9 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Sumner Place2.3 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆4/5
Eventide Williamsburg2.9 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5
Hillcrest Firethorn3.0 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lancaster LLC3.0 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Heartland Ridge Care Center3.4 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Southlake Village Rehabilitation & Care Center5.0 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Lancaster, NE — 14 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Lincoln →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285004.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details