NebraskaWaverly

Adept Nursing & Rehab of Waverly

11041 North 137th St, Waverly, NE 68462 · Lancaster County · 54 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Jun 1, 1994

Part of chain: AVID HEALTHCARE GROUP (11 facilities, chain avg rating 1.7★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$25,642
Fines, last 3 years
3.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 17, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jun 17, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 12, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 11, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 8, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Dec 5, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that.
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 28, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 10, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Dec 12, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310F
2024242J ▲
202530F
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $25,642, plus 2 Medicare payment denial periods.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 25, 2026Payment Denial16 days from May 25, 2026
Dec 5, 2024Payment Denial26 days from Feb 19, 2025
Jun 17, 2024Fine$9,805
Dec 12, 2023Fine$15,837

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.624.333.95bottom 22% in Nebraska; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.760.720.69top 39% in Nebraska; top 31% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.213.793.50bottom 22% in Nebraska; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.730.470.48top 12% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)78.148.745.8bottom 4% in Nebraska; bottom 3% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.044.142.9bottom 43% in Nebraska; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.74, weekend 3.11. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brass NE TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
BSD Beis Health TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
Copper NE TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
Douro Valley Investment, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/02/2023
Gold NE TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
NE 11 Holdings Opco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest08/02/2023
NE SNF Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
SF 4140 Olde Washington Boulevard Real Property LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/01/2023
Silver NE TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
Tulip Investments NE LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest08/02/2023
Pihlgren, LindseyIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE08/02/2023
Silberstein, AriIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/02/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Eastmont8.9 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Gateway Vista9.2 miLincoln, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Eventide Lincoln Care Center10.1 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Hillcrest Firethorn10.3 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Holmes Lake Rehabilitation & Care Center10.6 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
St. Jane de Chantal10.8 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Ambassador Health of Lincoln11.1 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Sumner Place11.9 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆4/5
Adept Nursing & Rehab of Ashland12.1 miAshland, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Brookside LLC12.2 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lancaster LLC12.6 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Southlake Village Rehabilitation & Care Center13.3 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Waverly →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285143.