NebraskaLincoln

Ambassador Health of Lincoln

4405 Normal Blvd, Lincoln, NE 68506 · Lancaster County · 122 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Feb 24, 1984

Part of chain: AMBASSADOR HEALTH (4 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.01
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 12, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough fresh-air ventilation, whether through windows, mechanical systems, or both.
May 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint
May 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
May 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202450F
202680F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.014.333.95bottom 41% in Nebraska; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.890.720.69top 27% in Nebraska; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.403.793.50bottom 33% in Nebraska; top 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.720.470.48top 12% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.248.745.8top 35% in Nebraska; top 37% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)22.244.142.9top 23% in Nebraska; top 17% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.36, RN 1.19, weekend 4.55. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ambassador Holding CompanyOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, SallyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, TimothyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Ambassador Holding CompanyOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Barry, SeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Barry, SeanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2025
Filliez, BrandyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Filliez, BrandyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
First National Bank OmahaOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2018
First National Bank OmahaOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Juilfs, SallyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, SallyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, SallyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, TimothyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, TimothyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, TimothyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/1985
Juilfs, TylerIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Juilfs, TylerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Juilfs, TylerIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2024
Lange, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/09/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
St. Jane de Chantal0.5 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Holmes Lake Rehabilitation & Care Center1.1 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Eventide Lincoln Care Center1.2 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Brookside LLC1.7 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sumner Place1.8 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆4/5
Gateway Vista1.9 miLincoln, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Eastmont2.2 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lancaster LLC2.6 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Eventide Williamsburg2.6 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5
Heartland Ridge Care Center3.0 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Hillcrest Firethorn3.5 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Southlake Village Rehabilitation & Care Center5.3 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lincoln →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285066.