NebraskaLincoln

Eventide Lincoln Care Center

4720 Randolph Street, Lincoln, NE 68510 · Lancaster County · 197 certified beds · avg 135 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1981 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 25, 2026 · F-0803 · triggered by a complaint

The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.

Why it matters: When menus aren't planned and followed properly, residents may not get the nutrition their health depends on.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (27)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 25, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Jun 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 30, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a written plan describing how it runs its quality improvement program — the ongoing process of finding problems in care and fixing them.
Apr 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 31, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' individual preferences, choices, values, and beliefs in their daily life and care. · from a complaint
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 17, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
2024100F
202530D
2026121G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.744.333.95top 7% in Nebraska; top 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.020.720.69top 15% in Nebraska; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.033.793.50top 7% in Nebraska; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.470.48top 25% in Nebraska; top 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)49.648.745.8bottom 46% in Nebraska; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)48.644.142.9bottom 43% in Nebraska; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.11, RN 0.91, weekend 4.47. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Eventide Nebraska Senior Living LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%10/10/2024
Bock, JodeeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Brandt, TerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Bye, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Bye, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
EventideOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2024
Feis, BethanyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2026
Fischbach, TylerIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Guerrero, JessicaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2026
Guerrero, JessicaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2026
Gulbranson, PatrickIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Johnson, VikkiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Johnson, VikkiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Larson-Casselton, CindyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Lee, JudithIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Lunak, BrandonIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Ohe, DarinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/20/2024
Riewer, JonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024
Schafer, EricIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2013
Seljevold, PeterIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/10/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Gateway Vista0.8 miLincoln, NE★★★☆☆3/5
St. Jane de Chantal1.1 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Ambassador Health of Lincoln1.2 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Eastmont1.4 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Holmes Lake Rehabilitation & Care Center1.6 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Sumner Place2.1 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆4/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Brookside LLC2.8 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Lancaster LLC2.9 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Hillcrest Firethorn3.8 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Eventide Williamsburg3.8 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5
Heartland Ridge Care Center4.0 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Southlake Village Rehabilitation & Care Center6.1 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lincoln →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285057.