NebraskaLincoln

Hillcrest Firethorn

8601 Firethorn Lane, Lincoln, NE 68520 · Lancaster County · 72 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Dec 7, 2017

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.17
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 20, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 10, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 1, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 1, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 20, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 16, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320E
202440F
202561G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNebraska avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.174.333.95bottom 45% in Nebraska; top 33% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.510.720.69bottom 24% in Nebraska; bottom 39% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.733.793.50top 48% in Nebraska; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.390.470.48bottom 46% in Nebraska; top 50% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)37.848.745.8top 27% in Nebraska; top 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.044.142.9bottom 43% in Nebraska; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.89, RN 0.47, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Hillcrest Operating Ventures, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%05/09/2016
Aswege-Mezenberg, DebraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Hillcrest Health Systems INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2016
Janicki, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Janicki, JamesIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Mulhearn, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Mulhearn, KevinIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/30/2023
Oestmann, MatthewIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Oestmann, MatthewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Svendgard, StaciIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/05/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Holmes Lake Rehabilitation & Care Center2.4 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Emerald Nursing & Rehab Brookside LLC2.9 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
St. Jane de Chantal3.0 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆3/5
Southlake Village Rehabilitation & Care Center3.1 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5
Eastmont3.2 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆3/5
Ambassador Health of Lincoln3.5 miLincoln, NE★★☆☆☆2/5
Gateway Vista3.7 miLincoln, NE★★★☆☆3/5
Eventide Lincoln Care Center3.8 miLincoln, NE★☆☆☆☆1/5
Eventide Williamsburg4.4 miLincoln, NE★★★★★4/5
Sumner Place5.3 miLincoln, NE★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lincoln →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 285300.