6135 Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Naples, FL 34113 (opens Google Maps) · Collier County · (239) 775-7715· 117 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since May 22, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: SOLARIS HEALTHCARE (22 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 29, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 6, 2025 · F-0600
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Mar 6, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. F-0600
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Jul 29, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them. · F-0825 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| Oct 25, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 14, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · F-0563 |
| Apr 14, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Apr 14, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Apr 14, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Apr 14, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Apr 14, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 5).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 7 | 3 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
2 fines totaling $80,532.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2025 | Fine | $46,176 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | Fine | $34,356 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.99 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 39% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.90 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 27% in Florida; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.53 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 50% in Florida; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 43% in Florida; top 34% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 17.3 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 4% in Florida; top 2% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 26.1 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 14% in Florida; top 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.83, weekend 3.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.71 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Solaris Healthcare Lely Palms. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buxbaum, Miriam | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/20/2024 |
| CH LP Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/20/2024 |
| LP SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 11/20/2024 |
| SK LP Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 11/20/2024 |
| Wahl, Ezriel | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Buxbaum, Miriam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Elterman, Frank | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Elterman, Frank | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Klein, Solomon | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| LP SNF Consulting LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| LP SNF Consulting LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/21/2025 |
| Petit, Jesta | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Ridinger, Kim | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Siegel, George | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Solaris Licensing | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
| Solaris Licensing | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/23/2025 |
| Wahl, Ezriel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/20/2024 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Solaris Healthcare — 22 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 21 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oakton Place Health and Rehabilitation at the Arli | 1.5 mi | Naples, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Woodside Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | Naples, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Naples Health and Rehabilitation Center | 7.1 mi | Naples, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Chateau at Moorings Park, the | 8.2 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Premier Place at the Glenview | 9.6 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Adviniacare at Naples | 9.7 mi | Naples, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Solaris Senior Living North Naples | 11.9 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Solaris Healthcare Imperial | 13.6 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bentley Care Center | 14.8 mi | Naples, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Renaissance at the Terraces | 17.9 mi | Bonita Springs, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105499.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details