CaliforniaMentone

University Post Acute

2278 Nice Ave, Mentone, CA 92359 · San Bernardino County · 50 certified beds · avg 48 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1976

Part of chain: ROCKWELL HEALTHCARE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.36
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Nov 20, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Sep 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Jul 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jul 26, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jan 24, 2022F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 24, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 24, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
Jan 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 24, 2022B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202290F
202450D
202530D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.364.313.95top 35% in California; top 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.270.610.69bottom 7% in California; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.023.903.50top 32% in California; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.170.510.48bottom 5% in California; bottom 8% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)45.836.745.8bottom 22% in California; bottom 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.038.142.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.96, RN 0.24, weekend 3.65. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Rockwell Healthcare LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/07/2021
Pesongco, JoseIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2023
Powell, EvangelineIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Powell, EvangelineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Rockwell Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Yumul, NeilIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Yumul, NeilIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Highland Care Center of Redlands3.2 miRedlands, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Plymouth Village3.8 miRedlands, CA★★★★☆4/5
Cedar Mountain Post Acute4.0 miYucaipa, CA★★★★☆4/5
Madison Grove Post Acute5.5 miRedlands, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Redlands Healthcare Center5.5 miRedlands, CA★★★★☆4/5
Redlands Comm Hosp D/P SNF5.5 miRedlands, CA★★★★☆5/5
Creekside Post Acute5.6 miYucaipa, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Yucaipa Hills Post Acute5.7 miYucaipa, CA★★★★☆4/5
Brookside Healthcare Center5.9 miRedlands, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Highland Palms Healthcare Center6.7 miHighland, CA★★★★☆4/5
Asistencia Villa Healthcare Center7.0 miRedlands, CA★★☆☆☆3/5
Totally Kids Rehabilitation Hospital - D/P SNF7.5 miLoma Linda, CA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mentone →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 555025.