TexasAustin

Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

6801 E Riverside Dr, Austin, TX 78741 · Travis County · 122 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Mar 23, 2010

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: HAMILTON COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT (10 facilities, chain avg rating 2.3★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
5
Serious findings on record
$88,227
Fines, last 3 years
3.42
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 26, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 25, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 10, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 3, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 28, 2025 · F-0755 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.

Why it matters: Weak pharmacy services lead to medication mistakes, delays, and missed drug interactions that can seriously harm residents.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 29, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 25, 2024 · F-0563 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose.

Why it matters: Restricting visits cuts residents off from the family and friends who support their well-being.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Oct 18, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Sep 5, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Sep 25, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 12, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 10, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 28, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 28, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Mar 26, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Sep 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to receive the visitors they choose, at the times they choose. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Sep 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Sep 12, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Sep 12, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 5, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361G ▲
2024121G ▲
202562J ▲
202641G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $88,227.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 26, 2025Fine$10,820
Sep 5, 2023Fine$77,407

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.423.463.95top 41% in Texas; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.430.440.69top 40% in Texas; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.843.043.50bottom 42% in Texas; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.340.48bottom 40% in Texas; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.555.345.8bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 31% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)46.754.642.9top 41% in Texas; bottom 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.38, RN 0.42, weekend 2.80. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Breeden, BobbyIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Breeden, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Breeden, BobbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/18/2022
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/18/2022
Hooper, GradyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2015
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Krol, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Krol, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Krol, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/02/2025
Songbird Healthcare, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2022
Songbird Healthcare, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Heritage Park Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing C4.2 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆1/5
Brookdale Westlake Hills6.1 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Barton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center6.4 miAustin, TX★★★☆☆3/5
The Arbour at Westminster Manor7.3 miAustin, TX★★★★★4/5
Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente7.3 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Sedona Trace Health and Wellness Center8.1 miAustin, TX★★★☆☆4/5
Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.4 miAustin, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5
Brush Country Nursing and Rehabilitation8.5 miAustin, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5
Coral Rehabilitation and Nursing of Austin8.8 miAustin, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Oakcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center8.8 miAustin, TX★★★☆☆2/5
West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center9.1 miAustin, TX★★☆☆☆2/5
Brodie Ranch Nursing and Rehabilitation Center9.9 miAustin, TX★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Austin →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 676246.