How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
4501 Dudmar Dr, Austin, TX 78735 (opens Google Maps) · Travis County · (512) 892-1131· 126 certified beds · avg 99 residents/day · certified since May 8, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: NEXION HEALTH (51 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 23 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Jan 20, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jan 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jan 2, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Feb 26, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 6, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint · F-0561 |
| Mar 11, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 19, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint · F-0578 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 13 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Texas avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.68 | 3.46 | 3.95 | top 26% in Texas; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.35 | 0.44 | 0.69 | bottom 41% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.17 | 3.04 | 3.50 | top 30% in Texas; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.48 | bottom 43% in Texas; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 42.2 | 55.3 | 45.8 | top 26% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 54.5 | 54.6 | 42.9 | bottom 49% in Texas; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.50, RN 0.34, weekend 3.02.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.50 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Barton Valley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Government - Hospital district
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt, Bretton | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health Leasing, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health of Ohi INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 10/08/2020 |
| Nexion Health, INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 10/08/2020 |
| Fallon, John | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Herdrich, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Kirley, Francis | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Lee, Brian | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Miller, Kelsey | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Nexion Health Leasing, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Nexion Health of Ohi INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Nexion Health, INC. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
| Reid, John | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Riner, Meera | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Riner, Meera | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/08/2020 |
| Riner, Meera | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2020 |
All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Nexion Health — 51 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 50 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brush Country Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.2 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Brookdale Westlake Hills | 2.4 mi | Austin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 4.4 mi | Austin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southpark Meadows Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente | 5.0 mi | Austin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Querencia at Barton Creek | 5.2 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Brodie Ranch Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.3 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Arbour at Westminster Manor | 6.4 mi | Austin, TX | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Riverside Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.4 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Heritage Park Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing C | 6.5 mi | Austin, TX | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Onion Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 6.8 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marbridge Villa | 7.4 mi | Manchaca, TX | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Coral Rehabilitation and Nursing of Austin | 8.6 mi | Austin, TX | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Travis, TX — 28 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675596.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details