Connecticut ›Bloomfield

Seabury

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

200 Seabury Drive, Bloomfield, CT 06002 (opens Google Maps) · Capitol County · (860) 286-0243· 72 certified beds · avg 68 residents/day · certified since Apr 21, 1993 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 21, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$28,105
Fines, last 3 years
4.80
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

  2. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 21, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Mar 21, 2024E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility admitted a resident without a doctor's order, or did not make sure each resident stayed under a doctor's ongoing care. · F-0710
Mar 21, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 17, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883
Aug 16, 2019E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Aug 16, 2019E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Aug 16, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not make sure care was delivered by qualified people following each resident's written care plan — the individualized document that spells out exactly what care that resident is supposed to receive. · F-0659
Aug 16, 2019D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 9).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940E
202230D
202490F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $28,105.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 18, 2025Fine$28,105

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityConnecticut averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.80
Connecticut average: 3.80
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.20
Connecticut average: 0.70
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.34
Connecticut average: 3.43
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.803.803.95top 11% in Connecticut; top 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.200.700.69top 10% in Connecticut; top 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.343.433.50top 12% in Connecticut; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.790.460.48top 9% in Connecticut; top 12% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)10.437.445.8top 1% in Connecticut; top 1% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)10.538.642.9top 5% in Connecticut; top 4% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.78, RN 1.19, weekend 4.32.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.78 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Seabury. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Regional context: $525.78/day — Connecticut statewide average for a semi-private nursing-facility room, September 30, 2025. This is a historical regional figure, not this facility's price or a prediction. View the OPM source.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Babbitt, BradfordIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2014
Bernasconi, ReneeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Bernasconi, ReneeIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Bernasconi, ReneeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2019
Bompastore, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2019
Bompastore, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/10/2019
Burnett, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/02/2023
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Cliftonlarsonallen LLPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2025
Dollar, EllenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/06/2025
Findlay, NorvillaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/13/2025
Healthpro Heritage LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2017
Healthpro Heritage LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2025
Jacques, CherylIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2025
Jasminski, AugustIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/07/2024
Knittel, RoseIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Knittel, RoseIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2025
Kuzmenko, RuslanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2017
Kuzmenko, RuslanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/09/2026
Kuzmenko, RuslanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018

Showing 20 of 34 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 14 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
  • "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
  • "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "Who would be my family member's attending doctor here, and how often would they be seen?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 10% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 34 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 74 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Touchpoints at Bloomfield0.8 miBloomfield, CT★★★★☆3/5
Bloomfield Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation0.8 miBloomfield, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Complete Care at Kimberly Hall-South2.1 miWindsor, CT★★★★☆3/5
Complete Care at Kimberly Hall North2.1 miWindsor, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Caleb Hitchcock Health Center2.5 miBloomfield, CT★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Saint Mary Home3.4 miWest Hartford, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Windsor3.6 miWindsor, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Chelsea Place Care Center LLC4.5 miHartford, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Hebrew Center for Health and Rehabilitation4.6 miWest Hartford, CT★★★☆☆2/5abuse
West Hartford Health & Rehabilitation Center4.9 miWest Hartford, CT★★★★★4/5
Parkville Care Center5.4 miHartford, CT★★★☆☆3/5
Riverside Health & Rehabilitation Center5.6 miEast Hartford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Capitol, CT — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Bloomfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075383.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details