North CarolinaBrevard

Sapphire Ridge Health and Rehabilitation

115 N Country Club Road, Brevard, NC 28712 · Transylvania County · 147 certified beds · avg 104 residents/day · certified since Jul 17, 1981

Part of chain: ASCENT HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.2★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$22,568
Fines, last 3 years
4.12
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (29)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
May 7, 2026C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not give residents reasonable access to and privacy in using ways to communicate, such as phones, mail, and email. Residents have the right to stay in touch with the outside world privately.
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130E
2025120E
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $22,568.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 17, 2023Fine$22,568

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNorth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.124.013.95top 27% in North Carolina; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.560.640.69top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 46% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.733.563.50top 25% in North Carolina; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.410.48top 34% in North Carolina; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.049.045.8top 36% in North Carolina; top 44% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)53.845.742.9bottom 38% in North Carolina; bottom 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.47, weekend 3.15. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Friedman, YisroelIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Pisgah Holdco LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Friedman, YisroelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Holl, BlairIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2025
Robinson, SusanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Robinson, SusanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Transylvania Regional Hospital2.7 miBrevard, NC★★★★☆4/5
The Oaks-Brevard3.0 miBrevard, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
The Greens at Hendersonville15.4 miHendersonville, NC★★★☆☆3/5
Valley Hill Health & Rehab Center15.8 miHendersonville, NC★★☆☆☆2/5
The Lodge at Mills River16.8 miMills River, NC★★★★★5/5
Orchard Valley Health and Rehabilitation17.0 miHendersonville, NC★☆☆☆☆2/5
River Falls Post Acute17.2 miMarietta, SC★★★☆☆4/5
The Laurels of Hendersonville17.8 miHendersonville, NC★★★☆☆2/5
Carolina Village INC18.1 miHendersonville, NC★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of Hendersonville18.3 miHendersonville, NC★★★☆☆2/5
Hendersonville Health and Rehabilitation19.0 miFlat Rock, NC★★★★★5/5
Silver Bluff19.5 miCanton, NC★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Brevard →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345208.