Wisconsin ›Milwaukee

Saint Johns on the Lake

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

1858 N Prospect Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53202 (opens Google Maps) · Milwaukee County · (414) 272-2022· 27 certified beds · avg 22 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1994 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 3, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 21, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.94
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 21, 2023 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Apr 17, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint F-0610

  2. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812

  3. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880

View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 1, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610
Jun 3, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 3, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Jun 3, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908
Jun 3, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605
Jun 3, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Jun 3, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881
Apr 24, 2024F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 21, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Feb 21, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Feb 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Feb 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757
Feb 21, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361G ▲
202410F
202560F
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityWisconsin averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.94
Wisconsin average: 4.29
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.64
Wisconsin average: 1.01
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.50
Wisconsin average: 3.84
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityWisconsin avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.944.293.95top 6% in Wisconsin; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.641.010.69top 8% in Wisconsin; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.503.843.50top 5% in Wisconsin; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.100.680.48top 9% in Wisconsin; top 5% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.746.945.8top 28% in Wisconsin; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)14.339.742.9top 10% in Wisconsin; top 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.25, RN 1.45, weekend 4.86.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.25 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Saint Johns on the Lake. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Saint John's Communities, INC.OrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/01/1994
Anderson, CassandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/14/2022
Anderson, ReneeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2011
Anderson, ReneeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2011
Armbruster, KathyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2016
Arndt, BettyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2022
Beal, PollyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2014
Beckley Milner, DianeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Behavioral Solutions INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Brighton Hospice Wisconsin LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/07/2023
Burke, ErinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/04/2019
Butler, HeleneIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/24/1999
Coburn, MatthewIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2021
Community Foot and Ankle Clinic INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2019
Coppernoll, LeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2018
Davis Clinical ConsultingOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2024
Dietitians on Demand Corporate Solutions, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/31/2022
Eager, DavidIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2023
Exum-Pryor, LakeshiaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/23/2018
Fry, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024

Showing 20 of 52 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 32 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
  • "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
  • "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
  • "What percentage of your residents are on antipsychotic or sedating medications, and how do you work to reduce that?"
  • "How do you screen new residents for mental health and disability-related needs, and how do you provide the specialized services they require?"
  • "Who oversees antibiotic use here, and how do you decide when an antibiotic is really needed?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 52 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 49 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Edenbrook Lakeside0.3 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
Jewish Home and Care Center0.5 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Milwaukee Catholic Home0.7 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★☆5/5
Eastcastle PL Bradford Ter Conv Ctr0.9 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★★3/5
Milwaukee Health and Rehab3.3 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★☆4/5
Mercy Health Services4.1 miMilwaukee, WI★★★☆☆3/5
St Ann Health and Rehabilitation Center4.1 miMilwaukee, WI★★★★☆4/5
Bayshore Nursing & Rehab4.8 miGlendale, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Wheaton Franciscan HC - Terrace at St Francis5.3 miMilwaukee, WI★☆☆☆☆1/5
St Francis Health Services5.5 miSaint Francis, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Aria at Mitchell Manor5.7 miWest Allis, WI★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Glendale West5.7 miGlendale, WI★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Milwaukee, WI — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Milwaukee →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 525539.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details