Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge

1133 Marlboro Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857 (opens Google Maps) · Middlesex County · (732) 360-9830· 180 certified beds · avg 163 residents/day · certified since Mar 1, 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

5/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

inspected Sep 25, 2025

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.49

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

Sep 25, 2025E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. F-0678
Sep 25, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. F-0700

View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Sep 25, 2025	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Sep 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678
Sep 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Sep 25, 2025	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806
Aug 27, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Aug 27, 2024	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684
Dec 8, 2022	F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814
Dec 8, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550
Dec 8, 2022	E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them. · F-0773
Dec 8, 2022	D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 4).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

All citationsSerious citations (G–L)

2022

2024

2025

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2022	10	F
2024	2	D
2025	4	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01

This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average

Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)

4.49

3.88

3.95

Registered Nurse hours

0.69

0.67

0.69

Weekend total nurse staffing

4.22

3.53

3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

Measure	This facility	New Jersey avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.49	3.88	3.95	top 18% in New Jersey; top 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.69	0.67	0.69	top 34% in New Jersey; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.22	3.53	3.50	top 14% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.52	0.50	0.48	top 31% in New Jersey; top 30% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	31.4	39.7	45.8	top 28% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	23.1	37.7	42.9	top 22% in New Jersey; top 18% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.56, RN 0.71, weekend 4.28.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.56 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Government - County

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Middlesex County Improvement Authority	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	03/01/2012
Gold, Evan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/23/2023
Gold, Evan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/23/2023
Middlesex County Improvement Authority	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2015
Niemiera, Mark	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2012

All 5 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
"What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
"How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
"When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
"Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"

Also worth asking anywhere

"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
"CMS reports 31% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
"Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 84 within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Reformed Church Home	1.7 mi	Old Bridge, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Preferred Care at Old Bridge, LLC	2.4 mi	Old Bridge, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Old Bridge	3.7 mi	Old Bridge, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Excel Care at Manalapan	3.8 mi	Manalapan, NJ	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Meadowbrook Respiratory and Nursing Center	4.9 mi	Matawan, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5
Complete Care at Madison, LLC	5.0 mi	Matawan, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Careone at Holmdel	6.2 mi	Holmdel, NJ	★★★★★	4/5
Careone at East Brunswick	6.2 mi	East Brunswick, NJ	★★★☆☆	3/5
Village Point	6.6 mi	Monroe Township, NJ	★★★☆☆	2/5
Complete Care at Bayshore LLC	7.1 mi	Holmdel, NJ	★★★★☆	3/5
Allaire Rehab & Nursing	7.3 mi	Freehold, NJ	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Anchor Care and Rehabilitation Center	7.8 mi	Hazlet, NJ	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Middlesex, NJ — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Rose Mountain Care Center — New Brunswick, NJ · overall 4/5
Spring Creek Healthcare Center — Perth Amboy, NJ · overall 4/5
St Joseph's Home Al & NC, INC — Woodbridge, NJ · overall 5/5
The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury — Cranbury, NJ · overall 2/5
Venetian Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC — South Amboy, NJ · overall 2/5
Accelerate Skilled Nursing and Rehab Piscataway — Piscataway, NJ · overall 2/5abuseSFF
Alameda Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Perth Amboy, NJ · overall 4/5

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Old Bridge →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315509.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

The Care File

Visit checklist — Roosevelt Care Center at Old Bridge

1133 Marlboro Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857 · (732) 360-9830

Health inspection rating 5/5 · CMS overall 5/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
☐ "What alternatives do you try before using bed rails, and how do you involve families in that decision?"
☐ "How do you track each resident's food allergies and preferences, and what happens if they don't like what's served?"
☐ "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
☐ "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 31% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 315509 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)