Pennsylvania ›Philadelphia

Wesley Enhanced Living Pennypack Park

8401 Roosevelt Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19152 · Philadelphia County · 120 certified beds · avg 115 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1978

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$14,015
Fines, last 3 years
3.99
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 29, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 29, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 30, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (36)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 3, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 29, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Jan 8, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Dec 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
2024200E
2025142G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $14,015.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 7, 2025Fine$14,015

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityPennsylvania avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.993.943.95top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.010.800.69top 20% in Pennsylvania; top 15% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.653.583.50top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 35% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.660.560.48top 27% in Pennsylvania; top 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.244.545.8top 39% in Pennsylvania; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)32.039.942.9top 36% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.94, weekend 3.40. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Evangelical ManorOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/03/1988
Conner, RonnieIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2024
Conner, RonnieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2024
Conner, RonnieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2024
Destefon, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023
Destefon, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Destefon, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023
Evangelical ManorOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/03/1988
Evangelical ManorOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/03/1988

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
The Pines at Philadelphia Rehab and Healthcare Ctr0.1 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★★4/5
Deer Meadows Rehabilitation Center0.1 miPhiladelphia, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Transitional Care Unit at Nazareth Hospital0.3 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★★4/5
Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center0.8 miPhiladelphia, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Immaculatemarycenter for Rehabilitation&healthcare0.8 miPhiladelphia, PA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Pennypack Rehab and Care Center1.6 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★☆4/5
Lafayette-Redeemer, the1.8 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★★5/5
Chapel Manor2.0 miPhiladelphia, PA★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Paul's Run2.5 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★★4/5
Oakwood Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center2.7 miPhiladelphia, PA★★★★☆4/5
St John Neumann Ctr for Rehab & Healthcare2.9 miPhiladelphia, PA★★☆☆☆2/5
Elkins Crest Health & Rehabilitation Center3.1 miElkins Park, PA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Philadelphia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395413.