510 Fifth Avenue, Owego, NY 13827 (opens Google Maps) · Tioga County · (607) 687-2594· 77 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE MAYER FAMILY (11 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 3, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 3, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. F-0583
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint F-0803
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint · F-0803 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint · F-0812 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign. · F-0847 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
| Nov 15, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · F-0577 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Oct 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Mar 4, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Mar 4, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Mar 4, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Mar 4, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 4, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Mar 4, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $12,735.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 2025 | Fine | $12,735 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.09 | 3.58 | 3.95 | top 22% in New York; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.78 | 0.68 | 0.69 | top 24% in New York; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.65 | 3.13 | 3.50 | top 20% in New York; top 36% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.73 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 14% in New York; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.7 | 40.3 | 45.8 | bottom 24% in New York; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 39.8 | 42.9 | bottom 8% in New York; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.68, RN 0.70, weekend 3.29.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.68 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for River View Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appel, Anna | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 04/01/2014 |
| Berman, Mordechai | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 04/01/2014 |
| Klein, Rivky | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 20% | 04/01/2014 |
| Landa, Hinda | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 04/01/2014 |
| Landa, Steven | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 8% | 04/01/2014 |
| Majerovic, Helen | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 04/01/2014 |
| Mayer, Andrea | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 5% | 04/01/2014 |
| Reich, Suri | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 04/01/2014 |
| Appel, Anna | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2014 |
| Berman, Mordechai | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2014 |
| Gewirtz, Jonathan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/11/2019 |
| Klein, Rivky | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2014 |
| Mayer, Andrea | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2014 |
| Suleiman, Samer | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/11/2019 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Mayer Family — 11 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 10 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ideal Senior Living Center | 9.3 mi | Endicott, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Absolut Ctr for Nursing & Rehab Endicott L L C | 9.8 mi | Endicott, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vestal Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 11.7 mi | Vestal, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Good Shepherd Village at Endwell | 12.1 mi | Endwell, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Willow Point Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 14.2 mi | Vestal, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Susquehanna Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L L C | 14.8 mi | Johnson City, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Elderwood at Waverly | 15.8 mi | Waverly, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Athens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 17.0 mi | Athens, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Elizabeth Church Manor Nursing Home | 17.3 mi | Binghamton, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sayre Health Care Center | 18.7 mi | Sayre, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Good Shepherd-Fairview Home INC | 19.0 mi | Binghamton, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bridgewater Center for Rehab & Nursing L L C | 19.5 mi | Binghamton, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335103.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details