New YorkVestal

Willow Point Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

3700 Old Vestal Road, Vestal, NY 13850 · Broome County · 300 certified beds · avg 255 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1969

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$166,364
Fines, last 3 years
4.31
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Mar 29, 2024 · F-0883

The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Why it matters: Flu and pneumonia are leading causes of serious illness and death in nursing homes, and vaccines are a key defense.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: May 6, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Mar 29, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: May 6, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Jun 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 29, 2024▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Mar 29, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Mar 29, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a proper governing body legally responsible for its policies and operations, or that body failed to appoint a properly licensed administrator to manage the facility.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jan 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Oct 29, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202170D
2024132L ▲
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $166,364.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 29, 2024Fine$166,364

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew York avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.313.583.95top 17% in New York; top 29% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.420.680.69bottom 18% in New York; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.783.133.50top 16% in New York; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.210.480.48bottom 18% in New York; bottom 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)52.140.345.8bottom 22% in New York; bottom 32% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)54.139.842.9bottom 20% in New York; bottom 30% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.25, RN 0.42, weekend 3.73. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Government - County

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Broome CountyOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/1967
Broome CountyOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/1967
Jerzak, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Susquehanna Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, L L C0.7 miJohnson City, NY★☆☆☆☆1/5
Elizabeth Church Manor Nursing Home3.3 miBinghamton, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
Vestal Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center4.2 miVestal, NY★★☆☆☆1/5
Good Shepherd Village at Endwell4.3 miEndwell, NY★★★★★5/5
Absolut Ctr for Nursing & Rehab Endicott L L C4.5 miEndicott, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Ideal Senior Living Center4.9 miEndicott, NY★★★★★4/5
Good Shepherd-Fairview Home INC5.0 miBinghamton, NY★★★☆☆3/5
Bridgewater Center for Rehab & Nursing L L C5.4 miBinghamton, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
River View Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center14.2 miOwego, NY★★★☆☆2/5
Meadow View Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center19.2 miMontrose, PA★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Vestal →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335291.