How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Rittenhouse Post Acute
Penn Med Rittenhouse Campus 1800 Lombard St 5th Fl, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (opens Google Maps) · Philadelphia County · (215) 893-2250· 38 certified beds · avg 33 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 1988 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 15, 2025
1
Serious findings on record
most recent May 15, 2025
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.44
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 15, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 15, 2025 · F-0689
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jun 13, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint F-0755
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. F-0689
View all 25 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Aug 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint · F-0755 |
| May 15, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 15, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's activities program was not run by a qualified professional. The person directing recreation and social activities must have proper training or credentials. · F-0680 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months. · F-0868 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint · F-0806 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough backup water supply for essential areas of the building. · F-0922 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · F-0943 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (10 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 1
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 10 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityPennsylvania averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.44
Pennsylvania average: 3.94
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.68
Pennsylvania average: 0.80
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.07
Pennsylvania average: 3.58
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Pennsylvania avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.44 | 3.94 | 3.95 | bottom 38% in Pennsylvania; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.68 | 0.80 | 0.69 | top 46% in Pennsylvania; top 38% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.07 | 3.58 | 3.50 | bottom 33% in Pennsylvania; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.48 | top 33% in Pennsylvania; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 40.7 | 44.5 | 45.8 | top 38% in Pennsylvania; top 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 39.9 | 42.9 | top 37% in Pennsylvania; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.68, RN 0.93, weekend 4.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.68 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: —/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rittenhouse Post Acute. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedarbridge Financial Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2025 |
| Harman, Dina | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Harman, Dina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Kirchdoerffer, Susan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Kirchdoerffer, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2025 |
| Marquis Health Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2024 |
| McGlone, Darrell | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| McGlone, Darrell | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| McGlone, Darrell | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| McGlone, Darrell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Nutraco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Papada, Jonathan | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Papada, Jonathan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/12/2024 |
| Posen, Mindee | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2024 |
Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Riverton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Allentown, PA · overall 5/5
- Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Philadelphia, PA · overall 2/5
- Springfield Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Springfield, PA · overall 2/5
- University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr — Philadelphia, PA · overall 3/5
- West Chester Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — West Chester, PA · overall 2/5
- Willow Grove Post Acute — Hatboro, PA · overall 3/5
- Yardley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Yardley, PA · overall 5/5
- Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — North Kingstown, RI · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How does your pharmacist review residents' medications, and how quickly can you fill new or urgent prescriptions?"
- "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "How do you learn about each resident's background and history, and how does that shape their care?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Pennsylvania midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 170 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University City Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr | 0.6 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| West Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 0.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Centennial Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 1.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Renaissance Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 1.5 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Logan Square Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.7 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Holy Family Home | 2.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Graduate Post Acute | 2.0 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Kearsley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 2.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Tucker House Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Simpson House INC | 2.4 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Care Pavilion Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 2.5 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Monumentalpostacutecare at Woodside Park | 2.6 mi | Philadelphia, PA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Philadelphia, PA — 46 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- River's Edge Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center — Philadelphia, PA · overall 4/5
- Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Philadelphia, PA · overall 2/5
- St John Neumann Ctr for Rehab & Healthcare — Philadelphia, PA · overall 2/5
- St Monica Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare — Philadelphia, PA · overall 2/5
- The Pines at Philadelphia Rehab and Healthcare Ctr — Philadelphia, PA · overall 5/5
- Transitional Care Unit at Nazareth Hospital — Philadelphia, PA · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 395749.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).