How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1096 North Ohio Street, Greenville, OH 45331 (opens Google Maps) · Darke County · (937) 548-1138· 76 certified beds · avg 64 residents/day · certified since Mar 3, 1980 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: VANCREST HEALTH CARE CENTERS (13 facilities, chain avg rating 4.0★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Aug 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Dec 19, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Dec 19, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · F-0607 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · F-0610 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 26, 2019 | C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · F-0732 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.52 | 3.45 | 3.95 | top 35% in Ohio; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.51 | 0.60 | 0.69 | bottom 42% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.18 | 3.07 | 3.50 | top 32% in Ohio; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.30 | 0.42 | 0.48 | bottom 30% in Ohio; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 57.9 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 26% in Ohio; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 43.9 | 42.9 | bottom 18% in Ohio; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.88, RN 0.56, weekend 3.50.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.88 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Rest Haven Nursing Home INC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagley, Jon | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 22% | 01/01/2003 |
| Gehl, Jacob | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2003 |
| McCleery, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 01/01/2003 |
| Myers, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 16% | 01/01/2003 |
| Resthaven Nursing Home INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 05/31/2004 |
| White, Carol | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/01/2003 |
| White, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 27% | 01/01/2003 |
| White, Steven | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 01/01/2003 |
| Bagley, Jon | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2004 |
| Bagley, Jon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Hess, Lisa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/20/2018 |
| McCleery, Mark | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2004 |
| McCleery, Mark | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2003 |
| Vancrest Management Corp. | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2011 |
| White, Mark | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/31/2004 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Vancrest Health Care Centers — 13 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 12 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village Green Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 0.4 mi | Greenville, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Greenville | 0.5 mi | Greenville, OH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Brethren Retirement Community | 2.1 mi | Greenville, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Versailles Rehabilitation and Health Care Center | 9.7 mi | Versailles, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Union City Care Center | 11.2 mi | Union City, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Stillwater Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 14.0 mi | Covington, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Piqua Manor | 18.1 mi | Piqua, OH | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pineknoll Rehabilitation Centre | 19.5 mi | Winchester, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365448.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details