How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Quitman County Health & Rehab LLC
350 Getwell Drive, Marks, MS 38646 (opens Google Maps) · Quitman County · (662) 326-3690· 60 certified beds · avg 46 residents/day · certified since Mar 23, 2016 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Aug 29, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.56
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 10 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
View all 10 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Aug 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 13, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 23, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityMississippi averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.56
Mississippi average: 4.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.48
Mississippi average: 0.74
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.22
Mississippi average: 4.09
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Mississippi avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.56 | 4.88 | 3.95 | top 20% in Mississippi; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.48 | 0.74 | 0.69 | bottom 20% in Mississippi; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.22 | 4.09 | 3.50 | top 30% in Mississippi; top 17% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.48 | bottom 19% in Mississippi; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 38.8 | 45.7 | 45.8 | top 32% in Mississippi; top 33% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 20.0 | 38.4 | 42.9 | top 21% in Mississippi; top 13% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.62, RN 0.40, weekend 3.50.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.62 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Quitman County Health & Rehab LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condado Health LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 10% | 01/01/2016 |
| Delaney, Steven | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 01/01/2016 |
| Medikey, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 01/01/2016 |
| Miles Healthcare, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 01/01/2016 |
| Pace, Garry | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 23% | 01/01/2016 |
| Beebe, Harold | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Campbell, Ashley | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2021 |
| Campbell, Ashley | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Delaney, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Long Term Care Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Long Term Care Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
| Pace, Garry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Shelton, Rebecca | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Waller, Robert | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Waller, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/22/2025 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Sardis Community NH — Sardis, MS · overall 2/5abuse
- Tishomingo Manor — Iuka, MS · overall 1/5abuse
- Tunica County Health & Rehab, LLC — Tunica, MS · overall 2/5
- Union Co Health and Rehab Center, INC — New Albany, MS · overall 5/5
- Washington Care Center — Greenville, MS · overall 3/5
- Windham House of Hattiesburg — Hattiesburg, MS · overall 5/5
- Audubon Health and Rehab — Thibodaux, LA · overall 4/5
- Forest Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Covington, LA · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you record and honor each resident's treatment wishes and advance directives, and how do staff know about them?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 39% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 15 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarksdale Nursing Center | 16.3 mi | Clarksdale, MS | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 255344.