Pruitthealth-Farmville

Name: Pruitthealth-Farmville
Address: 4351 South Main Street, Farmville, NC, 27828, US
Telephone: 2527535547

4351 South Main Street, Farmville, NC 27828 · Pitt County · 56 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Jul 3, 1991

Part of chain: PRUITTHEALTH (95 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$14,697

Fines, last 3 years

3.39

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 22, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Aug 7, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 7, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
May 22, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 22, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
May 11, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
May 11, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 11, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective.
May 11, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not designate a qualified infection preventionist — a trained person responsible for running the infection prevention and control program.
May 11, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 11, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
May 11, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
May 11, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 11, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 11, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 11, 2023	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 4).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	11	0	F
2024	3	0	D
2025	6	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $14,697, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Date	Type	Amount / length
May 22, 2025	Fine	$9,620
May 22, 2025	Payment Denial	3 days from Jun 13, 2025
Aug 8, 2024	Fine	$5,077

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	North Carolina avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.39	4.01	3.95	bottom 28% in North Carolina; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.73	0.64	0.69	top 24% in North Carolina; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.99	3.56	3.50	bottom 26% in North Carolina; bottom 30% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.55	0.41	0.48	top 19% in North Carolina; top 27% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	49.0	49.0	45.8	bottom 49% in North Carolina; bottom 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	42.9	45.7	42.9	top 45% in North Carolina; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.73, weekend 2.96. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
J Paige Pruitt Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Lisa P Hamby Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Neil L Pruitt Jr Trust	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
NWP 2020 Child Tr Fbo J Paige Pruitt	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/12/2020
Pruitt Properties INC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Pruitt, Neil	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	03/07/2021
Uhs-Pruitt Holdings, INC.	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2007
United Health Services INC	Organization	Indirect Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
United Health Services of North Carolina INC	Organization	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Brabham, Mindy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/17/2023
Brabham, Mindy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	04/08/2025
J Paige Pruitt Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Lisa P Hamby Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/26/2013
Loggins, Randall	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/11/2019
Neil L Pruitt Jr Trust	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/26/2013
Pruitt, Nancy	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Pruitt, Neil	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	11/27/2013
Pruitt, Neil	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/12/2007
Pruitt, Neil	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/13/2026
Pruitthealth Consulting Services INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	11/26/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
"If my family member is hospitalized, what is your bed-hold policy and what guarantees their right to return?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
Macgregor Downs Health Center by Harborview	9.9 mi	Greenville, NC	★★☆☆☆	2/5
East Carolina Health and Rehabilitation Center	10.4 mi	Greenville, NC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Greenville Health and Rehabilitation Center	10.5 mi	Greenville, NC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Greendale Forest Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	10.5 mi	Snow Hill, NC	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Ayden Court Nursing and Rehabilitation Center	11.8 mi	Ayden, NC	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Cypress Glen Retirement Community	13.9 mi	Greenville, NC	★★★★★	5/5
Longleaf Neuro-Medical Treatment Center	19.8 mi	Wilson, NC	★★★☆☆	2/5
Signature Healthcare of Kinston	19.8 mi	Kinston, NC	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Farmville →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 345384.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Pruitthealth-Farmville

4351 South Main Street, Farmville, NC 27828 · 2527535547

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 3/5· Fines (3y): $14,697

Most serious findings on record:

▲ May 22, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What safeguards do you have to protect residents' money and belongings, and what happens when something goes missing?"
☐ "If my family member is hospitalized, what is your bed-hold policy and what guarantees their right to return?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 345384 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)