1 Sisters of Providence, St Mary of the Woods, IN 47876 (opens Google Maps) · Vigo County · (812) 535-4001· 70 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Oct 17, 2012 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · May 16, 2025 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 24 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. F-0686
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
| May 16, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| May 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| May 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Mar 18, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint · F-0622 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint · F-0626 |
| Aug 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Feb 1, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2025 | Payment Denial | 43 days from Jun 17, 2025 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Indiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.70 | 3.42 | 3.95 | top 5% in Indiana; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.40 | 0.62 | 0.69 | top 2% in Indiana; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.90 | 3.01 | 3.50 | top 9% in Indiana; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.94 | 0.47 | 0.48 | top 4% in Indiana; top 7% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | — | 45.9 | 45.8 | — |
| RN turnover (%) | — | 40.4 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.15, RN 1.53, weekend 4.27.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Providence Health Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Church related
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Putnam County Hospital | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 12/01/2013 |
| Bray, Arnold | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2012 |
| Bray, Arnold | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2012 |
| Fry, Janice | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2012 |
| Fry, Janice | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2012 |
| Headley, Matthew | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2012 |
| Headley, Matthew | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2012 |
| Henman, Brandon | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/29/2023 |
| Hollowell, Christine | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2022 |
| Kigorwe, Kenneth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/2024 |
| Kigorwe, Kenneth | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/02/2024 |
| Klingel, Mary Beth | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/30/2022 |
| Landry, Keith | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Landry, Keith | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2020 |
| Lewis, Katrina | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/21/2022 |
| Lewis, Katrina | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/21/2022 |
| Lynch, Mandy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/25/2016 |
| Lynch, Mandy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/25/2016 |
| Mann, Robert | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2016 |
| Miller, Marcia | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/30/2016 |
Showing 20 of 36 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 16 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Majestic Care of Terre Haute | 3.6 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Harrison's Crossing Health Campus | 3.8 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Signature Healthcare of Terre Haute | 5.8 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westridge Health Care Center | 6.1 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Majestic Care of Deming Park | 6.5 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Westminster Village Health & Rehab | 7.1 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southwood Healthcare Center | 7.2 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Springhill Village | 7.9 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Vermillion Convalescent Center | 9.9 mi | Clinton, IN | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Cobblestone Crossings Health Campus | 10.1 mi | Terre Haute, IN | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Clinton Gardens | 10.6 mi | Clinton, IN | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Twin Lakes Extended Care | 13.1 mi | Paris, IL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155802.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details