IndianaSt Mary of the Woods

Providence Health Care Center

1 Sisters of Providence, St Mary of the Woods, IN 47876 · Vigo County · 70 certified beds · avg 63 residents/day · certified since Oct 17, 2012

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 16, 2025 · F-0686

The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.

Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 11, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
May 16, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
May 16, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
May 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Aug 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident return after a hospital stay or approved leave that lasted longer than the facility's bed-hold policy allowed. Residents generally have the right to come back to the next available bed. · from a complaint
Aug 21, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Feb 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 1, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Feb 1, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023110E
202460E
202561G ▲
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

0 fines totaling $0, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 16, 2025Payment Denial43 days from Jun 17, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityIndiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.703.423.95top 5% in Indiana; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.400.620.69top 2% in Indiana; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.903.013.50top 9% in Indiana; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.940.470.48top 4% in Indiana; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)0.045.945.8
RN turnover (%)0.040.442.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.15, RN 1.53, weekend 4.27. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Church related

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Putnam County HospitalOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2013
Bray, ArnoldIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Bray, ArnoldIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Fry, JaniceIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Fry, JaniceIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Headley, MatthewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Headley, MatthewIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2012
Henman, BrandonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/29/2023
Hollowell, ChristineIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2022
Kigorwe, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2024
Kigorwe, KennethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/02/2024
Klingel, Mary BethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2022
Landry, KeithIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Landry, KeithIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2020
Lewis, KatrinaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE12/21/2022
Lewis, KatrinaIndividualTrustee of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/21/2022
Lynch, MandyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/25/2016
Lynch, MandyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/25/2016
Mann, RobertIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2016
Miller, MarciaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/30/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Majestic Care of Terre Haute3.6 miTerre Haute, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Harrison's Crossing Health Campus3.8 miTerre Haute, IN★★★★★4/5
Signature Healthcare of Terre Haute5.8 miTerre Haute, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5
Westridge Health Care Center6.1 miTerre Haute, IN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Majestic Care of Deming Park6.5 miTerre Haute, IN★★☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Westminster Village Health & Rehab7.1 miTerre Haute, IN★★☆☆☆2/5
Southwood Healthcare Center7.2 miTerre Haute, IN★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Springhill Village7.9 miTerre Haute, IN★★★★☆4/5
Vermillion Convalescent Center9.9 miClinton, IN★☆☆☆☆2/5
Cobblestone Crossings Health Campus10.1 miTerre Haute, IN★★★☆☆2/5
Clinton Gardens10.6 miClinton, IN★★★★☆4/5
Twin Lakes Extended Care13.1 miParis, IL★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in St Mary of the Woods →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 155802.