How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Portsmouth Health and Rehab
727 Eighth Street, Portsmouth, OH 45662 (opens Google Maps) · Scioto County · (740) 354-8631· 95 certified beds · avg 78 residents/day · certified since Mar 7, 1984 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER (79 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jul 31, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.83
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 20 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint F-0880
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. F-0684
The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. F-0883
View all 20 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 31, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Apr 29, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety. · F-0740 |
| Oct 5, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids. · F-0685 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Mar 14, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 2).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 11 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOhio averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.83
Ohio average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.62
Ohio average: 0.60
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.51
Ohio average: 3.07
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Ohio avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.83 | 3.45 | 3.95 | bottom 14% in Ohio; bottom 9% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.69 | top 37% in Ohio; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.51 | 3.07 | 3.50 | bottom 13% in Ohio; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.53 | 0.42 | 0.48 | top 21% in Ohio; top 29% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.0 | 48.7 | 45.8 | bottom 48% in Ohio; bottom 39% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 21.4 | 43.9 | 42.9 | top 16% in Ohio; top 16% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.27, RN 0.71, weekend 2.91.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.27 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Portsmouth Health and Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acm Ashem Holdings, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 09/29/2022 |
| Flyer 6 Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 09/29/2022 |
| Flyer 6 Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/29/2022 |
| FTK Flyer Oh, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 09/29/2022 |
| Zanziper Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 09/29/2022 |
| Acm Ashem Holdings, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Fasten Halberstam LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Flyer 6 Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| FTK Flyer Oh, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Krieser, Akiva | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Med-Net Compliance LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Moerman, Rafael | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| NPNH1 LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Ovation Rehabilitation Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Patel, Jitendra | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Portsmouth Property LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Mortgage Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Ridout, Leah | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| Ridout, Leah | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
| SHS Keren LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2022 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Simcha Hyman & Naftali Zanziper — 79 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Xenia Health and Rehab — Xenia, OH · overall 1/5
- Collierville Nursing and Rehabilitation, LLC — Collierville, TN · overall 2/5
- Fairpark Health and Rehabilitation — Maryville, TN · overall 2/5
- Magnolia Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation — Covington, TN · overall 1/5
- Midtown Center for Health and Rehabilitation — Memphis, TN · overall 2/5
- Mt Pleasant Healthcare and Rehabilitation — Mount Pleasant, TN · overall 3/5
- Red Boiling Springs TN Opco LLC — Red Boiling Springs, TN · overall 3/5
- River Grove Health and Rehabilitation — Loudon, TN · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 78 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "What percentage of your residents and staff are vaccinated against flu and pneumonia, and how do you offer the vaccines?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "What mental health services do you provide on-site, and who delivers them?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Ohio midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 24 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgeport Health Care Center | 1.3 mi | Portsmouth, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| River Run Healthcare of Portsmouth | 1.6 mi | Portsmouth, OH | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Hill View Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente | 1.8 mi | Portsmouth, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| South Shore Nursing and Rehabilitation | 2.0 mi | South Shore, KY | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Ayden Healthcare of Rosemount Pavilion | 4.6 mi | Portsmouth, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Rest Haven Nursing Home | 7.8 mi | McDermott, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Concord Health & Rehab Ctr | 8.7 mi | Wheelersburg, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Best Care Health and Rehabilitation | 9.1 mi | Wheelersburg, OH | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Crystal Care Center of Franklin Furnace | 10.9 mi | Franklin Furnace, OH | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Edgewood Manor of Lucasville II | 12.5 mi | Lucasville, OH | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Edgewood Manor of Lucasville I | 13.1 mi | Lucasville, OH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Wurtland Nursing and Rehabilitation | 17.1 mi | Wurtland, KY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 365643.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).