CaliforniaRiverside

Mission Care Center

8487 Magnolia Avenue, Riverside, CA 92504 · Riverside County · 40 certified beds · avg 39 residents/day · certified since Nov 19, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: DAVID JOHNSON (48 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.59
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (20)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
May 7, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 26, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Feb 13, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Feb 13, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 13, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 13, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.
Jan 11, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly.
Jan 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough support staff to safely and effectively run its food and nutrition service.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure special medical diets — like low-sodium or diabetic diets — were properly ordered by the resident's doctor or managed by a qualified dietitian as state law allows.
Jan 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 11, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility had resident rooms smaller than required — at least 80 square feet per person in shared rooms and 100 square feet in single rooms.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024120F
202550F
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityCalifornia avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.594.313.95bottom 1% in California; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.540.610.69top 40% in California; bottom 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.393.903.50bottom 1% in California; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)1.240.510.48top 5% in California; top 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)26.136.745.8top 20% in California; top 8% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)29.438.142.9top 37% in California; top 28% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.45, RN 1.36, weekend 5.96. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chambers, ThomasIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2008
Johnson, DavidIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2008
Marmur, EliIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%06/10/2008
Marmur, EliIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/10/2008
Casa/Sierra California Associates LPOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/11/2025
Casa/Sierra California Associates LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/11/2025
Dehghanmanesh, AdrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2021
Dehghanmanesh, AdrianIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Dehghanmanesh, AdrianIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Ellsworth, AdamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/16/2022
Ellsworth, AdamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2025
Estaban, FrederickIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2016
Farrales, MaryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2023
Johnson, FrankIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Kochek, JoshuaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Kochek, JoshuaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Maheshwari, AnoopIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2012
Maheshwari, AnoopIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2012
Riverside Equities LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2008
Riverside Equities LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2008

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Alta Vista Healthcare & Wellness Centre0.6 miRiverside, CA★★★★☆4/5
Extended Care Hospital of Riverside0.6 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Woodcrest Post Acute & Rehabilitation0.6 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Villa Health Care Center0.7 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Citrus Grove Post Acute1.2 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Riverwalk Post Acute1.4 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆3/5
Valencia Gardens Health Care Center2.2 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Community Care and Rehabilitation Center2.7 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Arlington Gardens Care Center2.8 miRiverside, CA★★★☆☆2/5
Community Care on Palm3.9 miRiverside, CA★★★★☆3/5
Riverside Behavioral Healthcare Center4.0 miRiverside, CA★★★★★4/5
Riverside Postacute Care4.0 miRiverside, CA—/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Riverside →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 055542.