South CarolinaCharleston

Retreat at Wellmore of Daniel Island

580 Robert Daniel Drive, Charleston, SC 29492 · Berkeley County · 60 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Apr 12, 2019

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$8,428
Fines, last 3 years
4.74
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, facility-wide · Apr 17, 2026 · F-0812

The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Why it matters: Unsafe food handling is one of the most common causes of food poisoning, which can be dangerous for frail residents.

Severity (L): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation existed throughout the facility. The single most serious citation CMS can issue.

Corrected: May 11, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 11, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Aug 30, 2025 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 17, 2026▲ L · Immediate jeopardy, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Apr 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Apr 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 11, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 17, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 17, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 17, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Sep 5, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310D
202470F
202521J ▲
202671L ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,428.

DateTypeAmount / length
Sep 11, 2025Fine$8,428

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilitySouth Carolina avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.744.083.95top 16% in South Carolina; top 18% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.660.670.69top 34% in South Carolina; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.443.553.50top 13% in South Carolina; top 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.470.410.48top 24% in South Carolina; top 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)68.445.945.8bottom 2% in South Carolina; bottom 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)56.342.142.9bottom 24% in South Carolina; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.95, RN 0.69, weekend 4.64. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Wdi Parent LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/10/2016
Emmel, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2025
Live Oak Banking CompanyOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE05/23/2024
Live Oak Banking CompanyOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Sides, VickieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/10/2025
Thompson, BenjaminIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Thompson, BenjaminIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Thompson, BenjaminIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Thompson, DonaldIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/19/2024
Thompson, JoshuaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE08/13/2019
Thompson, JoshuaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Riverside Health and Rehab4.7 miCharleston, SC★☆☆☆☆2/5
Oak Harbor Healthcare4.8 miMt Pleasant, SC★★★☆☆3/5
Sandpiper Post Acute5.0 miMount Pleasant, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Franke Health Care Center6.0 miMount Pleasant, SC★★★★☆4/5
Kempton of Charleston6.2 miCharleston, SC★★★★★4/5
Ashley River Healthcare7.7 miCharleston, SC★★★★★4/5
NHC Healthcare - Charleston8.5 miCharleston, SC★★☆☆☆1/5
The Reserve Healthcare and Rehabilitation9.1 miCharleston, SC★★★★★5/5
Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Health Care Center10.1 miCharleston, SC★★★★★4/5
Life Care Center of Charleston11.7 miN Charleston, SC★★★☆☆2/5
White Oak Manor - Charleston12.0 miCharleston, SC★★★★☆4/5
Johns Island Post Acute14.8 miJohns Island, SC★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Charleston →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 425414.