How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Oak Grove Health & Rehab Center, LLC
776 Oak Grove Rd, Chesapeake, VA 23320 (opens Google Maps) · Chesapeake City County · (757) 389-7900· 120 certified beds · avg 119 residents/day · certified since Sep 6, 1990 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 19, 2026
3
Serious findings on record
most recent Aug 9, 2023
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.27
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 9, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Aug 9, 2023 · F-0580 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Why it matters: A family could learn about a serious injury or decline days later, after the chance to act has passed.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 9, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 19, 2019 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 19, 2019 · F-0684
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 26, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 19, 2019 · F-0697
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Jul 19, 2019 · F-0697
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Aug 26, 2019 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 30 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. F-0692
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
View all 30 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · F-0692 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Aug 9, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · F-0687 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jan 28, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · F-0622 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 19, 2019 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2019
All citations: 18
Serious citations (G–L): 2
2022
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 1
2026
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 18 | 2 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.27
Virginia average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.49
Virginia average: 0.66
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.79
Virginia average: 3.21
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.27 | 3.67 | 3.95 | bottom 42% in Virginia; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.69 | bottom 45% in Virginia; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.79 | 3.21 | 3.50 | bottom 40% in Virginia; bottom 20% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 46% in Virginia; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 46.8 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 45% in Virginia; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 56.0 | 48.2 | 42.9 | bottom 34% in Virginia; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.52, RN 0.53, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.52 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Oak Grove Health & Rehab Center, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Hajimomenian, Amir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2025 |
| Hayes, Le'anne | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Hayes, Le'anne | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Hippenstiel, Mark | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Ohi Asset (VA) Oak Grove LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Ohi Asset (VA) Oak Grove LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Saber Governance LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| SHG Boa LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/02/2026 |
| SHG Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| SHG Mt, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/02/2026 |
| TCF National Bank | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/02/2022 |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Volpe, Benjamin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Walker & Associates PC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
| Weisberg, William | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2020 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Saber Healthcare Group — 126 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Portside Health & Rehab Center — Portsmouth, VA · overall 3/5
- Ridgecrest Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation — Duffield, VA · overall 4/5
- Rocky Mount Health & Rehab Center — Rocky Mount, VA · overall 3/5
- Rosemont Health & Rehab Center, LLC — Virginia Beach, VA · overall 2/5abuse
- Shenandoah Nursing Home — Fishersville, VA · overall 5/5
- Shore Health & Rehab Center — Parksley, VA · overall 4/5
- South Boston Health & Rehab Center — South Boston, VA · overall 1/5
- Stratford Healthcare Center — Danville, VA · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 125 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Virginia midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 47% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 23 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 31 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Health and Rehabilitation Center | 0.8 mi | Chesapeake, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Chesapeake | 2.1 mi | Chesapeake, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Maimonides Health Center of Virginia Beach | 4.1 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Kempsville Health & Rehab Center | 4.7 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Deep Creek Health & Rehabilitation | 5.9 mi | Chesapeake, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Waterside Health & Rehab Center | 6.4 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Our Lady of Perpetual Help | 7.0 mi | Virginia Beach, VA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Portsmouth Health and Rehab | 7.1 mi | Portsmouth, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Norfolk | 7.2 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Harbor's Edge | 7.5 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Norfolk Health Care Center | 7.6 mi | Norfolk, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Portside Health & Rehab Center | 7.8 mi | Portsmouth, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 |
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495215.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).