KansasPeabody

Peabody Health and Rehab

407 N Locust Street, Peabody, KS 66866 · Marion County · 45 certified beds · avg 43 residents/day · certified since Jul 13, 2002

Part of chain: MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES (30 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$22,711
Fines, last 3 years
3.98
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Mar 18, 2024 · F-0742 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

Why it matters: Residents with mental health needs who go untreated can suffer worsening symptoms, distress, and isolation.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 12, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Nov 7, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Nov 2, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Feb 27, 2023 · F-0692

The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.

Why it matters: Malnutrition and dehydration can quickly weaken a resident and lead to serious complications.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 29, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (23)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 30, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 30, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
Mar 18, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 27, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 27, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 27, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 3, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Sep 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 3, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202150E
2023122J ▲
202411J ▲
202550F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $22,711.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 18, 2024Fine$14,518
Nov 7, 2023Fine$8,193

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.984.583.95bottom 33% in Kansas; top 40% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.690.810.69bottom 47% in Kansas; top 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.494.053.50bottom 34% in Kansas; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.450.490.48top 48% in Kansas; top 39% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)53.148.145.8bottom 35% in Kansas; bottom 29% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)71.442.042.9bottom 14% in Kansas; bottom 11% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.00, RN 0.52, weekend 2.63. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Barres, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
Crino, BryanIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
Feuer, ScottIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
Kansas Operator LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/25/2015
Lindeman, StuartIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
Passero, JosephIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
T and C Capital Assets, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
Windward Health Partners LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/26/2015
Borzumato, AndrewIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2015
Lindeman, StuartIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2015
Mission Health Communities, LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2015
Parmley, MelissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2015
Russell, RichardIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2015
Russell, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2015

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Access Mental Health0.2 miPeabody, KS—/5SFF
Parkside Homes13.1 miHillsboro, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Salem Home13.2 miHillsboro, KS★★★★★4/5
St Luke Living Center13.3 miMarion, KS★★★★☆4/5
Bethesda Home13.7 miGoessel, KS★★★★★5/5
Newton Presbyterian Manor14.1 miNewton, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Bethel Health Care Center14.3 miNorth Newton, KS★★★★★5/5
Wheat State Manor14.7 miWhitewater, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Kansas Christian Home14.7 miNewton, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Paramount Community Living and Rehab INC16.0 miNewton, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Schowalter Villa17.4 miHesston, KS★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Peabody →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175457.