Kansas ›Wichita

Mount St Mary

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

3700 E Lincoln St, Wichita, KS 67218 (opens Google Maps) · Sedgwick County · (316) 686-7171· 24 certified beds · avg 21 residents/day · certified since Mar 28, 2018 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: CSJ INITIATIVES (2 facilities, chain avg rating 4.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Mar 31, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.05
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread

    The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint F-0730

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint F-0695

View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 31, 2025F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · from a complaint · F-0730
Mar 31, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Mar 31, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0695
Mar 31, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint · F-0697
Mar 31, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · from a complaint · F-0758
Mar 31, 2025C · Potential for minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732
Oct 4, 2023F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespreadThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Oct 4, 2023E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690
Oct 4, 2023D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380F
202560F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityKansas averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 6.05
Kansas average: 4.58
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 1.13
Kansas average: 0.81
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.55
Kansas average: 4.05
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)6.054.583.95top 11% in Kansas; top 4% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.130.810.69top 17% in Kansas; top 11% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.554.053.50top 9% in Kansas; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.640.490.48top 24% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)31.048.145.8top 11% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.342.042.9top 34% in Kansas; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.08, RN 0.95, weekend 4.66.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.08 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Mount St Mary. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Congregation of the Sisters of St Joseph INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/01/2017
Bergen, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2014
Bergen, PatriciaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2014
Bise, DavidIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Bise, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2018
Bise, DavidIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Conway, NancyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2014
Conway, NancyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2014
CSJ Initiatives INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017
Kreyenbuhl, JoanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2014
Kreyenbuhl, JoanIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2014
O'Brien, MargueriteIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/04/2014
O'Brien, MargueriteIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2017
Parks, ChristineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2014
Parks, ChristineIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/09/2014
Quick, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Schab, TamiIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Slater, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/28/2018
Teichman, Rita AnnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2017

All 19 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain CSJ Initiatives — 2 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How often do you evaluate your nurse aides and what ongoing training do they receive?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
  • "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
  • "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
  • "Where do you post your daily staffing numbers, and can I see today's?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 31% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 19 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 32 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Lincoln Care and Rehab0.3 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Orchard Gardens1.8 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Medicalodges Wichita1.8 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Life Care Center of Wichita2.0 miWichita, KS★★★★☆3/5
Horizon Post Acute3.6 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Homestead Health Center3.7 miWichita, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Great Plains Post Acute4.1 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ascension Living via Christi Village McLean4.7 miWichita, KS★★★★★4/5
Larksfield Place4.8 miWichita, KS★★★★★4/5
Center at Waterfront LLC4.8 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare4.9 miWichita, KS★★★★★5/5
Meridian Rehabilitation and Health Care Center5.0 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Sedgwick, KS — 29 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Wichita →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175561.

This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details