KansasWichita

Regent Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare

10604 East 13th Street N, Wichita, KS 67206 · Sedgwick County · 84 certified beds · avg 73 residents/day · certified since Jun 22, 2012

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.86
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (15)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jul 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024100F
202510D
202640D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityKansas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.864.583.95top 35% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.990.810.69top 24% in Kansas; top 16% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.124.053.50top 42% in Kansas; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.580.490.48top 30% in Kansas; top 25% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.948.145.8bottom 47% in Kansas; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.042.042.9bottom 40% in Kansas; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.70, RN 0.96, weekend 3.99. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brooks, PhilipIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/16/2012
Buchanan, TimothyIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/16/2012
Legend Senior PropertiesOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/16/2012
R Park Associates LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/16/2012
Warren, BrianIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest04/16/2012
Brooks, PhilipIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2012
Buchanan, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2012
Foundation Properties CorporationOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2012
Savute, KatieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2021
Warren, BrianIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2012

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Center at Waterfront LLC0.2 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆2/5
Avita Health and Rehab at Reeds Cove1.8 miWichita, KS★★★☆☆3/5
Great Plains Post Acute2.4 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Larksfield Place2.8 miWichita, KS★★★★★4/5
Life Care Center of Wichita3.1 miWichita, KS★★★★☆3/5
Horizon Post Acute3.5 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Caritas Center, INC3.7 miWichita, KS★★★★★5/5
Orchard Gardens4.0 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Life Care Center of Andover4.2 miAndover, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Catholic Care Center, INC4.7 miBel Aire, KS★★☆☆☆2/5
Lincoln Care and Rehab4.7 miWichita, KS★☆☆☆☆1/5
Mount St Mary4.9 miWichita, KS★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Wichita →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 175527.