TexasBastrop

Silver Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

503 Old Austin Highway, Bastrop, TX 78602 · Bastrop County · 114 certified beds · avg 87 residents/day · certified since Nov 21, 1994

Part of chain: WELLSENTIAL HEALTH (67 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (31)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jun 5, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 5, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not notify the appropriate authorities when a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability had a significant change in condition.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Mar 14, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 18, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council.
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency.
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 28, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Mar 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 28, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023130E
2024120E
202560E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.893.463.95bottom 17% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.220.440.69bottom 11% in Texas; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.693.043.50bottom 29% in Texas; bottom 16% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.340.48bottom 41% in Texas; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)44.355.345.8top 31% in Texas; top 48% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.054.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.05, RN 0.23, weekend 2.84. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: —/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CSV Rhea Management Holdco, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
DWD TX Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Jack and Nancy Dwyer Workforce Development Center INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Reg Bridge Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Reg HG Opco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Reg Operator Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Regency Ihs of Bastrop Silver Pines, LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Regency Integrated Health Services LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Regency Texas Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Smithville Hospital AuthorityOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2018
188 Old Austin Highway LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Baird, DanielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/13/2021
Batlle, AugustinIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Bunte, MarkIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2020
Byrd, SaraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2020
Byrd, SaraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/10/2020
Clapp, BarbaraIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/01/2021
Cortese, DarenIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/10/2021
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Dekowski, DonovanIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Bastrop Lost Pines Nursing and Rehabilitation Cent0.1 miBastrop, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Windsor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Bastr0.3 miBastrop, TX★★☆☆☆3/5
Towers Nursing Home14.0 miSmithville, TX★★★★☆4/5
Elgin Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.5 miElgin, TX★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Bastrop →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 675434.