TexasSchulenburg

Schulenburg Regency Nursing Center

111 College St, Schulenburg, TX 78956 · Fayette County · 146 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Dec 6, 1990

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,827
Fines, last 3 years
4.07
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Dec 13, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Jan 16, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (16)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 11, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 11, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 10, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Dec 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 14, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility employed staff who were not licensed, certified, or registered as required by state law. · from a complaint
Oct 26, 2023F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records.
Oct 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320F
202481J ▲
202510E
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,827, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 13, 2024Fine$8,827
Dec 13, 2024Payment Denial1 days from Jan 15, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityTexas avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.073.463.95top 13% in Texas; top 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.310.440.69bottom 31% in Texas; bottom 10% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.503.043.50top 17% in Texas; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.130.340.48bottom 6% in Texas; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.455.345.8top 24% in Texas; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)50.054.642.9top 41% in Texas; bottom 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.71, RN 0.28, weekend 3.19. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CLG Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%01/01/2025
Oak Manor, INC.Organization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/24/1978
Greive, CharlesIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2006
Greive, CharlesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/26/2006
Greive, CharlesIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLENO DATE PROVIDED
Hatfield, PeytonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/13/2024
Hatfield, PeytonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/31/2024
Klaus, BartIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2024
Oak Manor, INC.OrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/24/1978
Oak Manor, INC.OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/02/2026
Paschall, KrissiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/31/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Paradigm at the Oak0.7 miSchulenburg, TX★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Parkview Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation7.8 miWeimar, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Flatonia Healthcare Center12.4 miFlatonia, TX★☆☆☆☆2/5abuse
Monument Rehabilitation and Nursing Center14.1 miLa Grange, TX★★★★☆4/5
Avir at la Grange15.5 miLa Grange, TX★★★☆☆3/5
Stevens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center of Halle16.8 miHallettsville, TX★★★★★4/5
Shady Oak Nursing and Rehabilitation16.8 miMoulton, TX★★★★★5/5
Hallettsville Nursing and Rehabilitation Center17.4 miHallettsville, TX★★☆☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Schulenburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 455908.