Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce

Name: Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce
Address: 400 Jeffrey, Cedar Springs, MI, 49319, US
Telephone: 6166960170

400 Jeffrey, Cedar Springs, MI 49319 · Kent County · 77 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Apr 26, 1976

Part of chain: MISSION POINT HEALTHCARE SERVICES (14 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$45,438

Fines, last 3 years

3.78

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 5, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 5, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 24, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Dec 10, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 3, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (26)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems.
Feb 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 12, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Dec 10, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Dec 10, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not train its staff on dementia care and on recognizing and reporting abuse, neglect, and exploitation. · from a complaint
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 10, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Aug 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Aug 22, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jan 3, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 4).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	1	0	D
2024	13	1	G ▲
2025	8	2	G ▲
2026	4	0	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $45,438, plus 1 Medicare payment denial period.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Mar 5, 2025	Fine	$45,438
Mar 5, 2025	Payment Denial	12 days from Mar 27, 2025

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Michigan avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.78	4.32	3.95	bottom 27% in Michigan; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.78	0.84	0.69	top 49% in Michigan; top 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.21	3.79	3.50	bottom 18% in Michigan; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.47	0.49	0.48	top 41% in Michigan; top 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	37.7	44.1	45.8	top 30% in Michigan; top 30% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	46.2	39.2	42.9	bottom 36% in Michigan; bottom 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.70, RN 0.76, weekend 3.14. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Mission Point Grand Rapids Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	02/14/2020
Cleveringa, Yuliya	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	02/14/2020
Mali, Hari	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/14/2020
Mission Point Management Services LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	02/14/2020
Sosnowski, Welarchie	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	02/14/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
"What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
The Oaks at Belmont	11.2 mi	Belmont, MI	★★★★★	4/5
Corewell Health Greenville Hospital Rehabilitation	14.1 mi	Greenville, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Michigan Veteran Homes at Grand Rapids	15.2 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce	15.5 mi	Greenville, MI	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Medilodge of Grand Rapids	16.6 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Leonard	16.7 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★★★☆☆	3/5
Corewell Health Rehabilitation & Nursing Center -	16.8 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Corewell Health Grand Rapids Hospitals Rehabilitat	17.1 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Porter Hills Health Center	17.8 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★★★★★	5/5
Valley View Care Center	18.1 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce	18.4 mi	Belding, MI	★★★★☆	2/5	abuse
St Ann's Home	18.4 mi	Grand Rapids, MI	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Cedar Springs →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 235294.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Mission Point Nursing & Physical Rehabilitation Ce

400 Jeffrey, Cedar Springs, MI 49319 · 6166960170

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $45,438

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Mar 5, 2025 (F-0600, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
▲ Mar 5, 2025 (F-0689, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
▲ Dec 10, 2024 (F-0600, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "How do you handle residents who need modified food textures, and how do you make those meals appetizing?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "If my family member falls or their condition changes, exactly when and how will I be notified?"
☐ "What specific steps do you take to prevent abuse and neglect, and how are staff trained on them?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 235294 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)