McClay Senior Care
3801 McClay Road, Saint Peters, MO 63376 · St. Charles County · 60 certified beds · avg 49 residents/day · certified since Jan 10, 2019
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 4, 2025 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 12, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 26, 2019 · F-0686
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: Jan 5, 2020 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
All citations in the current public record (42)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2025 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint |
| Apr 4, 2024 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Apr 4, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Sep 13, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint |
| Sep 13, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Aug 29, 2022 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (14 → 3).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 21 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2022 | 14 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Missouri avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.57 | 3.66 | 3.95 | top 17% in Missouri; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.49 | 0.69 | bottom 31% in Missouri; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.17 | 3.22 | 3.50 | top 15% in Missouri; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.48 | bottom 44% in Missouri; bottom 21% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 43.5 | 56.0 | 45.8 | top 19% in Missouri; top 46% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 0.0 | 47.8 | 42.9 | — |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.82, RN 0.27, weekend 3.48. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gettman, Gregory | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2015 |
| Gettman, Jennifer | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2015 |
| Allmon, Margaret | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2023 |
| Allmon, Margaret | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/31/2023 |
| Gettman, Gregory | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2015 |
| Gettman, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2015 |
| Gettman, Jennifer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2015 |
| Gettman, Jennifer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/24/2015 |
| Goetz, Julie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/08/2018 |
| Goetz, Julie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2018 |
| Goetz, Rachel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2022 |
| Goetz, Rachel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2022 |
| Jackson, Mary | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2018 |
| Jackson, Mary | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/18/2018 |
| Wittenauer, Julie | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
| Wittenauer, Julie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Peters Rehab and Healthcare Center | 2.4 mi | Saint Peters, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| St Peters Post Acute | 3.0 mi | Saint Peters, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ignite Medical Resort St Peters | 3.0 mi | Saint Peters, MO | —/5 | ||
| NHC Healthcare, St Charles | 3.3 mi | Saint Charles, MO | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Aspen Point Health and Rehabilitation | 3.7 mi | Saint Charles, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Lutheran Senior Services at Breeze Park | 4.5 mi | Saint Charles, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lewis & Clark Gardens | 4.7 mi | Saint Charles, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurel Meadows Wellness & Rehabilitation | 5.3 mi | Saint Charles, MO | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Windsor Estates of St Charles | 6.0 mi | Saint Charles, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Garden View Care Center | 6.3 mi | O Fallon, MO | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Surrey Place St Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing | 6.4 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Friendship Village Chesterfield | 6.8 mi | Chesterfield, MO | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Saint Peters →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265875.