MissouriChesterfield

Friendship Village Chesterfield

15250 Village View Drive, Chesterfield, MO 63017 · St. Louis County · 98 certified beds · avg 91 residents/day · certified since Oct 15, 1975

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 3, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 12, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
May 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
May 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Oct 19, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Jul 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jul 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Oct 11, 2019E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201930E
202340E
2024110E
202520D
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMissouri avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.403.663.95top 5% in Missouri; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.850.490.69top 7% in Missouri; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.713.223.50top 6% in Missouri; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.330.48top 18% in Missouri; top 45% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)46.656.045.8top 26% in Missouri; bottom 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)8.347.842.9top 4% in Missouri; top 3% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.40, RN 0.69, weekend 3.84. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
FV Services, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/07/2017
Eichholz, JerryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Fasick, JohnIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2014
Fasick, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
FV Services, INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2017
Giffin, DavidIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Giffin, DavidIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Hachman, WadeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Hachman, WadeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/10/2025
Klumpp, KennethIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/13/2017
Klumpp, KennethIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/28/2025
Meyer, LisaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Seibert, LydiaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Seibert, LydiaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2020
Wittenauer, JulieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2023
Wittenauer, JulieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Westchester House, the0.5 miChesterfield, MO★★☆☆☆2/5
Delmar Gardens of Chesterfield1.0 miChesterfield, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Surrey Place St Lukes Hospital Skilled Nursing1.0 miChesterfield, MO★★★★☆3/5
Garden View Care Center of Chesterfield1.1 miChesterfield, MO★★★★☆4/5
Mason Pointe Care Center1.6 miChesterfield, MO★★★★★5/5
Delmar Gardens West1.6 miTown and Country, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Brooking Park2.1 miChesterfield, MO★★★☆☆3/5
Athene Nursing and Rehabilitation3.1 miTown and Country, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Delmar Gardens on the Green3.8 miChesterfield, MO★★☆☆☆3/5
Creve Coeur Manor4.2 miSaint Louis, MO★☆☆☆☆1/5
Country Villa Wellness & Rehabilitation4.9 miCreve Coeur, MO★★★☆☆4/5
Manchester Rehab and Healthcare Center5.1 miBallwin, MO★☆☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chesterfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 265121.