189 Monica Blvd, Lynchburg, VA 24502 (opens Google Maps) · Lynchburg City County · (434) 847-2860· 90 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Apr 12, 2013 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2024
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 5, 2024
$10,033
Fines, last 3 years
3.41
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 20, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. F-0760
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. F-0803
View all 16 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
Date
Severity
What the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2024
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Jun 5, 2024
▲ G · Actual harm, isolated
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Jun 5, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803
Jun 5, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804
Jun 5, 2024
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Jun 5, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Jun 5, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Jun 5, 2024
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Jun 5, 2024
C · Potential for minimal harm, widespread
The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585
Feb 10, 2022
E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Feb 10, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645
Feb 10, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Feb 10, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 10, 2022
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888
Feb 17, 2021
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686
Feb 17, 2021
D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated
The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations:
2
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2022
All citations:
5
Serious citations (G–L):
0
2024
All citations:
9
Serious citations (G–L):
2
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Year
Citations
Serious (G–L)
Worst severity that year
2021
2
0
D
2022
5
0
E
2024
9
2
G ▲
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
Date
Type
Amount / length
Jun 5, 2024
Fine
$10,033
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityVirginia averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility:
3.41
Virginia average:
3.67
U.S. average:
3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility:
0.49
Virginia average:
0.66
U.S. average:
0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility:
3.04
Virginia average:
3.21
U.S. average:
3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
Measure
This facility
Virginia avg
U.S. avg
Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
3.41
3.67
3.95
top 46% in Virginia; bottom 32% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours
0.49
0.66
0.69
bottom 46% in Virginia; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing
3.04
3.21
3.50
top 41% in Virginia; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)
0.25
0.46
0.48
bottom 30% in Virginia; bottom 22% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)
39.5
48.1
45.8
top 29% in Virginia; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)
27.3
48.2
42.9
top 15% in Virginia; top 24% in the U.S.
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.52, weekend 3.19.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.57 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Liberty Ridge Health & Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020)
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
BNV Dynasty LLC
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Saber Healthcare Holdings LLC
Organization
Direct Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/20/2013
Wiw Dynasty LLC
Organization
Indirect Ownership Interest
NOT APPLICABLE
01/01/2023
Bundle Tenant LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
12/16/2025
Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
02/13/2013
Isabelle, Chad
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
10/27/2025
Isabelle, Chad
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
10/27/2025
Mitchell, William
Individual
Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
01/14/2026
Mitchell, William
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
07/01/2023
Nicoluzakis, Gregory
Individual
Corporate Officer
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
Nicoluzakis, Gregory
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
03/01/2019
RSF SP Liberty Ridge V, L.P.
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
08/01/2025
Saber Governance LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
Saber Healthcare Group LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
04/12/2013
SHG Management LLC
Organization
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
SHG Management LLC
Organization
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
09/01/2019
Swim, Kyle
Individual
Operational/Managerial Control
NOT APPLICABLE
10/05/2025
Swim, Kyle
Individual
ADP of the SNF
NOT APPLICABLE
10/05/2025
Showing 20 of 27 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 7 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Saber Healthcare Group — 126 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495411.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
The Care File
Visit checklist — Liberty Ridge Health & Rehab
189 Monica Blvd, Lynchburg, VA 24502 · (434) 847-2860
Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $10,033
Most serious findings on record:
▲ Jun 5, 2024 (F-0658, Actual harm, isolated): The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
▲ Jun 5, 2024 (F-0760, Actual harm, isolated): The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Questions for the administrator:
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
☐ "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
☐ "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
☐ "CMS reports 40% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
☐ "The ownership record on file lists 27 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
☐ "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
While you're there, notice:
☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)
Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 495411 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)