Tate Springs Health & Rehab

Name: Tate Springs Health & Rehab
Address: 2200 LANDOVER PLACE, Lynchburg, VA, 24501, US
Telephone: 4348464626

2200 Landover Place, Lynchburg, VA 24501 · Lynchburg City County · 118 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since May 4, 1970

Part of chain: HILL VALLEY HEALTHCARE (43 facilities, chain avg rating 1.8★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

2.74

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Sep 4, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 19, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Nov 18, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 18, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 18, 2021	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Nov 18, 2021	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 21, 2019	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Feb 21, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 21, 2019	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 21, 2019	C · Minimal risk, facility-wide	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Feb 21, 2019	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 21, 2019	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2019	6	E
2021	11	E
2023	3	D
2024	1	D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Virginia avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	2.74	3.67	3.95	bottom 9% in Virginia; bottom 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.52	0.66	0.69	top 47% in Virginia; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	2.47	3.21	3.50	bottom 17% in Virginia; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.36	0.46	0.48	top 44% in Virginia; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	36.0	48.1	45.8	top 22% in Virginia; top 26% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	38.9	48.2	42.9	top 34% in Virginia; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.00, RN 0.57, weekend 2.71. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Individual

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
CRG VA Pro 7 SNF Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	13%	02/01/2023
HVH VA Pro 7 SNF Operations Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	53%	02/01/2023
PH VA LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	11%	02/01/2023
VA Pro 7 SNF Operations Holdings LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	02/01/2023
Idels, Shimon	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023
Rogers, Delisa	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
"Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
"What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
"How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Seven Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing	0.2 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	SFF
Forest Health & Rehab Center	0.3 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★★★★☆	4/5
Guggenheimer Health and Rehab Center	2.0 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Westminster-Canterbury of Lynchburg INC	2.8 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★★★★★	5/5
Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation Center	3.1 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Summit Health and Rehab Center	5.3 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★★★☆☆	2/5
Liberty Ridge Health & Rehab	5.4 mi	Lynchburg, VA	★★★★☆	3/5
Fairmont Crossing Health and Rehab Center	13.7 mi	Amherst, VA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Oakwood Health and Rehab Center	19.1 mi	Bedford, VA	★★☆☆☆	1/5
Bedford Co Nursing Home	19.2 mi	Bedford, VA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Lynchburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495077.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Tate Springs Health & Rehab

2200 Landover Place, Lynchburg, VA 24501 · 4348464626

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
☐ "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
☐ "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
☐ "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 495077 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)