Liberty Ridge Health & Rehab
189 Monica Blvd, Lynchburg, VA 24502 · Lynchburg City County · 90 certified beds · avg 81 residents/day · certified since Apr 12, 2013
Part of chain: SABER HEALTHCARE GROUP (126 facilities, chain avg rating 2.9★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 5, 2024 · F-0658
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Why it matters: Care that falls below professional standards can directly harm a resident's health and recovery.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 20, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 5, 2024 · F-0760
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.
Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.
Corrected: May 20, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)
All citations in the current public record (16)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | ▲ G · Actual harm, one-off | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Jun 5, 2024 | C · Minimal risk, facility-wide | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Feb 10, 2022 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 9).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 9 | 2 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
1 fine totaling $10,033.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2024 | Fine | $10,033 |
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Virginia avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.41 | 3.67 | 3.95 | top 46% in Virginia; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.49 | 0.66 | 0.69 | bottom 46% in Virginia; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.04 | 3.21 | 3.50 | top 41% in Virginia; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.46 | 0.48 | bottom 30% in Virginia; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.5 | 48.1 | 45.8 | top 29% in Virginia; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.3 | 48.2 | 42.9 | top 15% in Virginia; top 24% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.57, RN 0.52, weekend 3.19. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin N. Volpe Family Dynasty Trust (dated December 29, 2020) | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| BNV Dynasty LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Decanted William I. Weisberg Family Dynasty Trust (dated Sept 30, 2020 | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Saber Healthcare Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/20/2013 |
| Wiw Dynasty LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Bundle Tenant LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/16/2025 |
| Citrin Cooperman Advisors LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/13/2013 |
| Isabelle, Chad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2025 |
| Isabelle, Chad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/27/2025 |
| Mitchell, William | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/14/2026 |
| Mitchell, William | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2023 |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Nicoluzakis, Gregory | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| RSF SP Liberty Ridge V, L.P. | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/01/2025 |
| Saber Governance LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Saber Healthcare Group LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/12/2013 |
| SHG Management LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| SHG Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Swim, Kyle | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/05/2025 |
| Swim, Kyle | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/05/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
- "Who reviews your menus, and can I see this week's menu and join my family member for a meal?"
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "What is your approach to psychiatric medications — how do you try non-drug options first and work to reduce doses over time?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lynchburg Health & Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Summit Health and Rehab Center | 3.8 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Guggenheimer Health and Rehab Center | 5.1 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Forest Health & Rehab Center | 5.3 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Tate Springs Health & Rehab | 5.4 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Seven Hills Rehabilitation and Nursing | 5.5 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Westminster-Canterbury of Lynchburg INC | 8.2 mi | Lynchburg, VA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Autumn Care of Altavista | 15.9 mi | Altavista, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Bedford Co Nursing Home | 18.0 mi | Bedford, VA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Fairmont Crossing Health and Rehab Center | 18.4 mi | Amherst, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Oakwood Health and Rehab Center | 18.7 mi | Bedford, VA | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Appomattox Health & Rehabilitation Center | 19.2 mi | Appomattox, VA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 495411.